From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBCG_pfpBBoE-O92dw@googlegroups.com Thu Jan 06 09:42:44 2011 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PatrE-0005Lv-0c; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:44 -0800 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11sf15095782gyb.16 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=/FhfHfIE30LCvSlmiYRRxEHb7sYc+CkjXDFGkfcWthA=; b=Ht5ollqQ8/+LiPyfEh9RS/heHJWxM74dVhfO6oF36Yxd35aQzDZSNNGA+YOgfAER7S xsnVo5Nxsq4ksOnzi+5S7l3pEnojB6YtIf34a6MuA3vKhKKhRzaQUhQ7PonB36apAJtb 0GqVddiNPrEvCOrjowqaotUt5Rf1kkVCK/Sp4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=jkYrjHZnsk6w1mi2B2e5GZ/stfpBbuMcQEfRQIXrZJ1ahwJq9xUulJnrNRy0sJ+lZY Xcxegabz5LY/qKrz0hOL+mo9PSEaJdg5qjy86LeuSD3ir6encI49oFrPBo+atPPl+wzA EoqTuvWo/zAyfspSicpxE2mOWmySSvK8W6VNc= Received: by 10.91.109.14 with SMTP id l14mr154976agm.21.1294335750597; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.4.7 with SMTP id 7ls526863and.7.p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr4088832anq.23.1294335749947; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr4088831anq.23.1294335749917; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (mail-gy0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i35si10240235anh.10.2011.01.06.09.42.29; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.160.179; Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so7772862gyg.24 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.142.12 with SMTP id u12mr23759287ybn.356.1294335749692; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.243.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f13sm14665742yhf.33.2011.01.06.09.42.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:42:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:42:24 -0700 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar Message-ID: <20110106174224.GC27821@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110106141506.GA27424@134.sub-75-208-112.myvzw.com> <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110106145108.GS17534@digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:51:08AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Similarly, I can't see that CMAVO-clause is referenced anywhere. > > Commentend out, with a note-to-self. > My intuition is that, if this does need to be referenced somewhere, it would be to properly parse (as well as one could parse) experimental cmavo. I note that typing la'oi into camxes doesn't output a parse tree, though I think this is a post-parse "issue" rather than an issue with the grammar. -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.