From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBCWiZjpBBoEnz2-_A@googlegroups.com Thu Jan 06 10:06:31 2011 Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PauED-0006Fr-88; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:30 -0800 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35sf15610552yxn.16 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=U0EBFJ5A0rN9YcIyDYVrJOhkLdCLgfnkeT0Og18m768=; b=PPPuSU4mcJq417IsoAC6P8BKquK9+Uipu+0ZBrJWjHfjAH1H4KYma2lQ0zOMgbAs4r pNDYPClJL+6O7eWicaQ/zUDeW59qZD3j9gd5aDBAmWsTr8yaA5UcxSA+oLBj4+P8ywI+ Mf8PMHbX9QNoLxTiDHV+h14Ldn6MdIpYi0GhQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=bwY9EyCXJnYBgdfeB4irc+QwH0tGbRT2qq+Zi5jcGv2ZuLrE4Rr0nTFPNK2OI7/dMp T8tGUJgquqMbBaMCOYJQFZxnMufCP74AMcrLUQAw1X0OCo0eEGeL9VmqP4rS6blXiiZX dmx9fc2utzBpgbeuvntgULHmEc6wc7a187LLI= Received: by 10.147.124.18 with SMTP id b18mr1710476yan.16.1294337174283; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.48.32 with SMTP id v32ls9454534ybv.3.p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.133 with SMTP id q5mr333357yhg.3.1294337173800; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.133 with SMTP id q5mr333356yhg.3.1294337173779; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f177.google.com (mail-gy0-f177.google.com [209.85.160.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31si2519601yhl.14.2011.01.06.10.06.13; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.160.177; Received: by mail-gy0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 4so6265898gyg.8 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.116.1 with SMTP id o1mr2292178agc.127.1294337173414; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.243.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i10sm32464111anh.12.2011.01.06.10.06.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:06:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:06:09 -0700 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla and lujvo wordlists? Message-ID: <20110106180609.GE27821@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110104182103.GB22902@alice.local> <20110106174457.GA17534@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110106174457.GA17534@digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.160.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:44:57AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:21:03AM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > > I've just added test cases to test for proper morphological > > classification of all cmavo and gismu to my Lojban parser, > > jbogenturfa'i[1]. I'm using cmavo.txt[2] and gismu.txt[3] from > > lojban.org's publications. > > > > I'd like to add test cases for proper classification of lujvo and > > fu'ivla as well. These word classes aren't closed in the same way > > that cmavo and gismu are. > > > > I'm hoping someone has available one of the following: > > > > 1) The minimal set of fu'ivla and lujvo to cover all of the > > productions used in the PEG grammar to classify these word types. > > i.e., all of the different kinds of fu'ivla and lujvo. > > > > 2) A representative set of fu'ivla and lujvo that I can use much > > like I'm using cmavo.txt and gismu.txt: a big pile of > > already-classified words that I can run through the parser and > > verify that the parser agrees that each word belongs in it's > > respective class. > > Pierre provided me with his vlatai test data at one point, so you > want to talk to him, and xorxes. > I've written both of them off-list, thank you Robin. -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.