From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRDH053pBBoEOGIiPQ@googlegroups.com Fri Jan 07 11:30:29 2011
Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRDH053pBBoEOGIiPQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PbI13-0007II-3t; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:29 -0800
Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1sf16353899ywh.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:message-id:x-ymail-osg:received
         :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=mXO47f3QnyU7AEelvnmkoOGh54NhE3Gg0Ib/+zyvPko=;
        b=CYa0COEnEPsYCSForVONsyBR57pwj7gdzDVdglykFsvu1kP6MJENSf1eBDNYVSTLNo
         Cm0X0/K3pGXoE226jhRFJIuDJazr1/3nQ/41W8CCzRnRFWAW0ajzvM6rfz5SZ+jhUr2O
         xsA96JZozcPQJtZEc/0rwwEeFNnMdZRQzqYMc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references
         :date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=2+U+2tnWspLg4sejJLBO+W4/ZXstAIAMCoRa2+3xXSap6+IABUP1/OlZE5QMo7CaYi
         AmEx/L5oz2+jnes6PIzSCMC4peZqHTdG8RTQFy7zLVHKgn4aic0UMa6IYOJO+zJkobXS
         ObKLSGFrcf71bGeEV8zz4USMuudQHd6pkAGmA=
Received: by 10.101.136.2 with SMTP id o2mr829178ann.68.1294428615760;
        Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.100.156.5 with SMTP id d5ls3556599ane.1.p; Fri, 07 Jan 2011
 11:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.195.5 with SMTP id s5mr4498692anf.56.1294428615181;
        Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.195.5 with SMTP id s5mr4498691anf.56.1294428615157;
        Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.118])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id i35si10784887anh.10.2011.01.07.11.30.14;
        Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:14 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 68.142.199.118 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.142.199.118;
Received: (qmail 86801 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2011 19:30:13 -0000
Message-ID: <586437.85834.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: FbOgETgVM1l87yxHfxbohaHgt2xmMCc0Xd5eQPaUFEweAJ.
 LEsdmjvskGKMZrHbKOs0TePpj2pNJ2FmSEukxGX7suopw0Q0Hkm1ZDXEonF8
 cul.Bpc4utB8qL8J8HRV7oCNL5kYX.s.UtSVGryoZK12t2IDy4p6mJx6Y2oE
 2HyJuUruDHmXkY9C1dU1lNl48hlkZ65WLrve1DbjFuysqIvsmfe_SKO4TabR
 x_9b9_sI0BxmntBiPgSz_MKVwsUJgBO2i2CG5pUCv7Kx.JKmbdgHfox7Otjx
 RWBxPPzmVEUPuAslPm79_zGn5tUqqt.EtrfwrYKsgKmmbsyKliiTfvoNyX16
 1YPq6ePJsuF7u9ij0LRh5ZSaf18HdU6ej2iYYCpbn_lxw_FhSbHMxgCOZBLC
 xYiwLYBeju5XKHw--
Received: from [99.92.110.13] by web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:30:13 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259
References: <9114501.161.1294150198377.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhy19> <7c0687a1-deba-495a-9760-95d1d0649423@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <AANLkTimyOJQ+X5TdRLFsqPyrpNhnMQ+jDEM3HJ2p11KO@mail.gmail.com> <20110105165231.GK17534@digitalkingdom.org> <AANLkTikK89pvtXnzKz0vYpghcGci40G+QGuwi83a5GOG@mail.gmail.com> <20110105220532.GN17534@digitalkingdom.org> <AANLkTi=Q8o39u0wsrbA6PXTdVGtz=-pZOnVnNaXWorDb@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=O-gw8FyS2s8F4GJvwDmhZZv3b=iqr3QU6wBte@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikBtwF4aPzvZB=q+H8Ek9JbGK-ZUUfAHr56YudX@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikrNDum61pqzfM8Fn4-DOVuC-AM_B-=V=mWjies@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimOXE8yX3NVQDsJfhf4Z7ke__LZ+GMC1C6rfGxU@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=Ft=aPyrKj19z5sdMoBg6jFRHDJsFos-T=k2t1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikNqOVexx_MuEpcMpdocgveZdF50jTN3BLveodR@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTintruHP5CEFV7xzvfNWNU0RyUjohtp7RQwTR7Qu@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim6q0o7bAJkcyLd8ydJfk54gesTaWEmagWLOwaE@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikeJDvEvXfKCpF1AAPh2utDaU3AB+cGZgFY+95u@mail.gmail.com> <673286.9022.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <AANLkTin9wSWVDx3F4m_+rBW9MU1sA8pNRzarKgzR=wy+@mail.gmail.com> <294930.94884.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=vrEiG-ao+gct_yEiEZO-JTWjne1FFiii77kSz@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=nuikATcsuAvLGZa_Ae6Yoayk0ks2-_FE96AAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:30:13 -0800 (PST)
From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Cake, Pie or Ice Cream? (was: Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop
 saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language))
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=nuikATcsuAvLGZa_Ae6Yoayk0ks2-_FE96AAw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates
 68.142.199.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass
 (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1332241152-1294428613=:85834"

--0-1332241152-1294428613=:85834
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I suppose 'ji' can, in theory, be extended to any number of choices, though the 
practicalities of memory would cut this short somewhere around five.  The other 
problem is that of scope: if we have to do a series of DeMorgans to decipher 
what is wanted, the length of a feasible string is going to be reduced 
considerably.  So it would be best to consider the connectives as being between 
atomic elements and all be 'e' based.  But then there is the problem of things 
that you don't care about one way or the other (so, an occasional 'u') and thing 
that you definitely want (at least) one of though don't much care which.  And so 
on.  Conclusion: 'ji' is not a generalizable solution for choices.



      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--0-1332241152-1294428613=:85834
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></he=
ad><body><div style=3D"font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;fon=
t-size:12pt"><div>I suppose 'ji' can, in theory, be extended to any number =
of choices, though the practicalities of memory would cut this short somewh=
ere around five.&nbsp; The other problem is that of scope: if we have to do=
 a series of DeMorgans to decipher what is wanted, the length of a feasible=
 string is going to be reduced considerably.&nbsp; So it would be best to c=
onsider the connectives as being between atomic elements and all be 'e' bas=
ed.&nbsp; But then there is the problem of things that you don't care about=
 one way or the other (so, an occasional 'u') and thing that you definitely=
 want (at least) one of though don't much care which.&nbsp; And so on.&nbsp=
; Conclusion: 'ji' is not a generalizable solution for choices.<br></div><!=
-- cg4.c201.mail.mud.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Thu Jan  6 07:39:46
 PST 2011 -->
<input id=3D"gwProxy" type=3D"hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick=3D"=
if(typeof(jsCall)=3D=3D'function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500=
);}" id=3D"jsProxy" type=3D"hidden"><div id=3D"refHTML"></div></div><br>

      </body></html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--0-1332241152-1294428613=:85834--