From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEPrxnekEGgRuzfBR@googlegroups.com Fri Jan 07 12:35:21 2011 Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbJ1o-0008Jz-JM; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:20 -0800 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9sf4806966pzk.16 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=gBQJ88zNBlE4PZnAZXdwIA8NwbDDz81i68PO+yAm+Bc=; b=i9RcKj10elGJsFjo86WKcXhikF3afyRT6gcz2gVwV4wQwiXk0/Hcuuu/rRFzdZ6d7k K7wlGBWW8MHsKO8ewrW+PukIwgwQC8dPHsQMpsj/NseZ49pPyUg7rIXA61ZvGEEGIF1T Wg6gNnI7N454c20adcmh+ihKPHTFZFsEZmJ6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=nqYowgHnIbfj50mNYAPE+aiZfY9IL+KbjfA3HmEg1pHd2biH5H2N2O9RCkBKgLasmY F8xV1o0tQOQLfP1xNzKtdXRsVaScsHrC9a/FSOxl+hQ1m93M6+GnQXr069NQ7lwdUBFK L6Lyrr0AdjU70eAvrebtmcw0bqfQPFklmz2eg= Received: by 10.142.150.10 with SMTP id x10mr154743wfd.56.1294432506585; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:06 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.97.18 with SMTP id u18ls2602402wfb.2.p; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.126.16 with SMTP id y16mr2014685wfc.66.1294432505025; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.126.16 with SMTP id y16mr2014684wfc.66.1294432505007; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p40si2635675wfc.2.2011.01.07.12.35.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbJ1b-0008Jd-BT for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:35:03 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:35:03 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Cake, Pie or Ice Cream? (was: Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language)) Message-ID: <20110107203503.GX23787@digitalkingdom.org> References: <673286.9022.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <294930.94884.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20110107194348.GT23787@digitalkingdom.org> <687487.87250.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <687487.87250.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:14:33PM -0800, John E Clifford wrote: > 1. Nice, but without the choices, which I guess were part of the problem. > 2. Yeah, fine if you can be sure to use 'e' throughout, but that is a less > general solution. Why the double negation on 'lo sakta'? Random urge. > Is this the start of the scope problems (and, if so, why not 'a' > in the last place and the values are reversed, so I guess it isn't > but is just a mystery). 'enai', I suppose, but your double > negation has me worried. Yeah, it might not be the right thing. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.