From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEMaBnukEGgS9dceQ@googlegroups.com Fri Jan 07 13:08:36 2011 Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbJXz-0001No-Ap; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:36 -0800 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2sf5498051pwi.16 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=B8YnbIdu8+aUWTaLAaUII+WunujunzTd+ZGsdvjfQfo=; b=1C3Qq21kSCd0eFnCRE4lE1Q5XBFBF/tXH6Ay7hNJ/mvBupoMk2juT5rFIr4P7xsXTj 2VrFvj0v/Cx5aTZhbo4aUqW5+ByP3UKaD1mZKHO9CmHjUnGW06F1LyQluxQSPQbxYaWV PXbLABDeVtjywZFJB8n+Tj/NZARaN2uDZ/9D8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=HQ4UKye8YEdzn7IA3M8onMBtbunLKTT9D/2DxLJqpZRpk6nxXcD0aUnqZRfgr0AHXf zDjN1sCgY3Fv/6I9r8oOtYUvS2tKTXlDIyxOzyt+OrkPtQFIssob8f0D19sGxXw4Gffl yrlc1Jd3AEUzwbBpr22zCj62+dpPAbcsmrahY= Received: by 10.142.151.42 with SMTP id y42mr159070wfd.46.1294434502036; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.249.41 with SMTP id w41ls30241894wfh.1.p; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.148.3 with SMTP id v3mr2060206wfd.43.1294434500990; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.148.3 with SMTP id v3mr2060203wfd.43.1294434500947; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m3si2660205wfl.5.2011.01.07.13.08.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbJXo-0001Nk-47 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:08:20 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:08:20 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Cake, Pie or Ice Cream? (was: Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language)) Message-ID: <20110107210820.GB23787@digitalkingdom.org> References: <294930.94884.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20110107194348.GT23787@digitalkingdom.org> <201101071606.28875.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201101071606.28875.phma@phma.optus.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:06:25PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 07 January 2011 14:43:49 Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Assuming {mi djica lo ladru .e nai lo sakta na .e lo titnanba} > > means "I want milk and a donut, but not sugar", then it seems to > > me that {do djica lo ladru ji lo sakta ji lo titnanba}, > > responded to with {.e nai na .e} would DTRT. > > ".e nai na .e", according to both jbofi'e and camxes, is > ungrammatical. What's the right way to answer two conjunctions to > a question? You could certainly stick an .i in there? -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.