From lojban+bncCKv97aq_GRDwqJ7pBBoE8FwEVg@googlegroups.com Fri Jan 07 14:32:36 2011 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbKrE-0001zr-0O; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:35 -0800 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10sf6905729fxm.16 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=XpjMrQAT3T3yTUYLeod15hJiXGZKGyBXAHCwfs2pEFI=; b=IYhc2mbTemnqWjoOb47Fn6kbkCoB0ubJ3VZ02IrfpA3VS4dnsfUlz+ZNixymbhEIij 3Dtjbm1IKLz//TtkWImhfo4TFeyzHByEYmMVqk4JpRUrEFaqF/qfdlTbUQ5QBCsIZu7t JXZObPLs1RQ3S0XZlmzETZrJxosGddeJC81qo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=veUAhuoMajSe3cgrlFkU3zyMx+4Xdf46RGvCqFHPTPj6ZHzfZ86Ugf/j1cJFiNFBEc xndvWSE5zdPe1w0fW9OzpPjRA7sp7eIn4iq302jCkV90ptU825JAuLVVI5jRbjVASFh5 2IYNWsJO0FAN6d7gxEPaBXKG5AcuhwubyYIcM= Received: by 10.223.108.211 with SMTP id g19mr1877117fap.24.1294439536960; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.160.8 with SMTP id l8ls4982119fax.2.p; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.74.136 with SMTP id u8mr1859411faj.13.1294439535976; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.74.136 with SMTP id u8mr1859410faj.13.1294439535926; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 9si2223178fax.13.2011.01.07.14.32.14; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.44; Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so17339157bwz.3 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.74 with SMTP id l10mr6624851bkq.77.1294439534638; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.66.77 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:32:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <9114501.161.1294150198377.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhy19> <7c0687a1-deba-495a-9760-95d1d0649423@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <20110105165231.GK17534@digitalkingdom.org> <4D25CFD8.6010408@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:32:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language) From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lamelnyk@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d58a4ba53590049949303f --0016e6d58a4ba53590049949303f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/1/7 MorphemeAddict > Lojban is not, because it doesn't have the vocabulary necessary to express > everything that a native speaker might want to express. > We can [auto]generate the huge list of [random] words, put it to jbovlaste, give the access to anyone, wanting to allocate the word for a meaning, or just automatically allocate one for each word of each natlang. So, we'll get the "richest" vocabulary in a few months. Is that your definition of "polished"? -- mu'o mi'e lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016e6d58a4ba53590049949303f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2011/1/7 MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>=
Lojban is not, because it doesn't have the vocabulary necessary to= express everything that a native speaker might want to express.
<= /blockquote>

We can [auto]generate the huge list of [random] word= s, put it to jbovlaste, give the access to anyone, wanting to allocate the = word for a meaning, or just automatically allocate one for each word of eac= h natlang. So, we'll get the "richest" vocabulary in a few m= onths. Is that your definition of "polished"?

--
mu'o mi'e lex

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e6d58a4ba53590049949303f--