From lojban+bncCKv97aq_GRCf2aXpBBoEmgPITA@googlegroups.com Sun Jan 09 00:07:10 2011 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbqIr-0004fc-U8; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:07:10 -0800 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10sf7894099fxm.16 for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hyu38IJnuBeW7nsVtyc4tiM9Ly9HdqO4U6A/PbhcOzc=; b=va/Gz+qCRCQ4ot0LFIm46ArBdj/OVI9LL+0oTO2el69cYfHGbD5cIIgZrbZqtZbgSi Q53X445O/p2OTmFfmnMDbSSZoisDutwdQvsVsaYPUvkgBiS+F8hKt/Z5fQrZSR78sPlJ mqnap3ONgJH2aAbKCVuf5UqK6vAEk2BLXeU6o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Q6uSX42SkJvJZXCgT5DIdoiCQvBlw8RLw2xIpGsOrhUzmJBNPHh0HdN8GdL/Sj7Lht JMj9QwlhUoQB+7FzdksI8Q0LjnGC7S0L1FkXJS0zYWWvM99aKgAIvVCvkgG6Z1V+YXbk N0cHnPcis1JVEFlKYS3W8C4R5EW1+TRGEWkMk= Received: by 10.223.73.197 with SMTP id r5mr1832319faj.30.1294560415844; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:55 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.7.80 with SMTP id c16ls5178189fac.3.p; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.87.67 with SMTP id v3mr1750544fal.23.1294560414608; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.87.67 with SMTP id v3mr1750543fal.23.1294560414590; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com (mail-bw0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e12si2361174fav.12.2011.01.09.00.06.53; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.51; Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so11289176bwz.10 for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.74 with SMTP id g10mr7516082bkd.131.1294560413293; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:06:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.66.77 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 00:06:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <913593.57689.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <9114501.161.1294150198377.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhy19> <7c0687a1-deba-495a-9760-95d1d0649423@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <20110105165231.GK17534@digitalkingdom.org> <4D25CFD8.6010408@lojban.org> <63371.11455.qm@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20963.85801.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <913593.57689.qm@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 10:06:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language) From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lamelnyk@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555f706931be2049965553f --00032555f706931be2049965553f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/1/9 John E Clifford > Portable recorder (a pen size say) and transcription at the end of each > day. > Oops, i forget my own argument. I've tried to show that, once we have a nice word creation algorithm, filling the vocabulary is too easy to be that important. -- mu'o mi'e lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --00032555f706931be2049965553f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2011/1/9 John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>=
Portable recorder (a pen size say) and transcription at t= he end of each day.

Oops, i for= get my own argument. I've tried to show that, once we have a nice word = creation algorithm, filling the vocabulary is too easy to be that importan= t.

--
mu'o mi'e lex

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--00032555f706931be2049965553f--