From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBDMh7npBBoE8qgfBg@googlegroups.com Wed Jan 12 16:14:19 2011 Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PdApU-0005kU-69; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:19 -0800 Received: by gwj17 with SMTP id 17sf813775gwj.16 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DQWvXbfHOHFv2U1+oBN4WqxHMZrF33u+sBRSvLLfF8U=; b=p/yPslegy0Hsm5qYcCehzkiQ5iBzxcrqBpZaglZmcINKepavtDMsEtNYMD1AOV376b fXMyWdcM/SrSNOz1hE0Jfs1lQjIjKyqVSgo7geQw2IfsNaEpeQFCMFPm+1UH+o2d/i7O ttWg/aUurqtDxkoINSya9ckndBcfGBeuoEH1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=SVu6S02s0x3h4G1f77NkpyjpExYlcoJS7oYBceYbh8Y6ptSzdxyt3LrWzZ23e0UW35 HQJdjlnogCFeOO5e0iiN7ZVZK9PzAJOXY7Y0ETKWrMF8+/oIlUEUS0cYXFpOrsipLQ9E VFU9XxA4CNmT2nOq0QiFXsNe9MYABkqDZcn8s= Received: by 10.90.82.8 with SMTP id f8mr130317agb.47.1294877644375; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:04 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.200.3 with SMTP id eu3ls1239299ibb.1.p; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.172.146 with SMTP id l18mr1437160ibz.2.1294877642360; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.172.146 with SMTP id l18mr1437159ibz.2.1294877642304; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com (mail-iw0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m30si278555ibu.6.2011.01.12.16.14.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.175; Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so1046784iwn.6 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.59.197 with SMTP id m5mr1770590ibh.25.1294877641085; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.200.148 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:14:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110113000444.GS2132@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110112141124.GA866@alice.local> <20110112184918.GP2132@digitalkingdom.org> <20110112234509.GB1262@alice.local> <20110113000444.GS2132@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:14:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] any-word-SA-handling clarification From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e7741cd313ee0499af3114 --001485e7741cd313ee0499af3114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 With all this talk of {sa}, what about {ra}? It seems like it would have a similar set of issues. ta'onai when I see {sa} I usually assume something like "cut all the words back to the last {.i}". Is coding something like that in PEG possible? On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:45:09PM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote: > > I've attached a patch that removes *most* of the commented-out > > productions in the lojban.peg file you've checked into github. > > Oh, I figured you'd just do a pull request. :) > > > This patch removes the commented-out rules having to do with SA > > handling, and in one sense can be seen as a continuation of > > removing the *-no-SA-handling in the PEG grammar. > > > > I'm not at the point yet where I'm testing SA, so I don't really > > know if these rules work better than the ones that aren't > > commented out. camxes is using the not-these, however. Can they > > go? > > Yeah, that's fine. > > -Robin > > -- > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001485e7741cd313ee0499af3114 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With all this talk of {sa}, what about {ra}? =A0It seems like it would have= a similar set of issues.

ta'onai when I see {sa} I = usually assume something like "cut all the words back to the last {.i}= ". =A0Is coding something like that in PEG possible?

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Robin Lee P= owell <= rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 04:45:09PM -0700, .alyn.post. wro= te:
> I've attached a patch that removes *most* of the commented-out
> productions in the lojban.peg file you've checked into github.

Oh, I figured you'd just do a pull request. =A0:)

> This patch removes the commented-out rules having to do with SA
> handling, and in one sense can be seen as a continuation of
> removing the *-no-SA-handling in the PEG grammar.
>
> I'm not at the point yet where I'm testing SA, so I don't = really
> know if these rules work better than the ones that aren't
> commented out. =A0camxes is using the not-these, however. =A0Can they<= br> > go?

Yeah, that's fine.

-Robin

--
http://singinst.org/= : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.loj= ban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this senten= ce is false"
is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
--
You received this message because y= ou are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001485e7741cd313ee0499af3114--