From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDis7npBBoEyaHZ5A@googlegroups.com Wed Jan 12 17:48:33 2011 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PdCIg-0006Db-0r; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:33 -0800 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf1352435wyb.16 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0dzCKlInbX4ijJA3YmkcnqntA42gA5WB0cVYRJ/U27Y=; b=qryZnyGMTbvfux+rRiTtmj879NtlLUO5Xk3aG6Laed65rW6o9OGZzTpjCfynWj/LfG 7ehVRboISODNJgJWT3qHA3Owx+3PPDHiGZJXLrYy6UVLEjRA4ceUBkylu/VDtpGVkCP9 cmBXGZLAMTfigIgNtbaEWPh/hgTKsXKPfY0Gc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ODnnuqdGQSJb3Ix4mWK3W4wpKni+WmlDQCZtAGzEIPPNC0XcX30nO1DV7UP33IxY2C d7Yyh1ytU18rHiR/VhDzDVP52oz3STE0u9gzCyujtsNldC/GpjM4snyJ2mkpGGscXwz/ CbF2akPQiJ2Vpws9JQgWmZ96GnhumRVhygX9k= Received: by 10.216.172.71 with SMTP id s49mr13231wel.27.1294883298096; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.208.4 with SMTP id p4ls531804weo.2.p; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.70.145 with SMTP id p17mr116263wed.0.1294883296823; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.70.145 with SMTP id p17mr116262wed.0.1294883296794; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id t13si177912wbc.4.2011.01.12.17.48.15; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180; Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so1202914wyb.11 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.132.213 with SMTP id c21mr1766634wbt.28.1294883295611; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.54.72 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110113001636.GT2132@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110112141124.GA866@alice.local> <20110112184918.GP2132@digitalkingdom.org> <20110112234509.GB1262@alice.local> <20110113000444.GS2132@digitalkingdom.org> <20110113001636.GT2132@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:48:15 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] any-word-SA-handling clarification From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:14:01PM -0500, Luke Bergen wrote: >> ta'onai when I see {sa} I usually assume something like "cut all >> the words back to the last {.i}". =A0Is coding something like that >> in PEG possible? > > Trivial. =A0That would be a *fantastic* version of {sa} from a parsing > perspective. =A0Sooooo much better than the current version. I agree, although it should be only an "active" ".i", i.e. not including things like "zo .i", ".i bu", "zoi .i ... .i", and so on. That rule should be easy to implement and use. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.