From lojban+bncCPGMg4mHHBD2sY7pBBoE1guXYw@googlegroups.com Tue Jan 04 14:02:45 2011 Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PaExj-0003Tc-Ko; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:44 -0800 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6sf51147919qwd.16 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=j6gDfpsOMNb6DnFxPsN9+E9PAxeCy/P10cHzc/CqDMk=; b=sd/VCJE/aWp9vjiL81Obn+qfAmvGmtZ5LkjXlAuXoKjvYGbCULwI6y8dJ3SimU1S2R G5iQ3EvHiyztpesZm3IZwRmlAbUfjUzDhpFjMg3O+Wu9LAd70F+RdOah8EP1bf3E/3ie C53A3H2SzkWv5PwLE2eoFK4oiJp8nihzvZ8UA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=45obGmPUxFKvgR4oxGgMJ3LCo40mqNWHKTEuzs126wsMJOv01F+x+HnsqUjjqKe1YO yqathEQ/eluPLletyBURpeJzGW1YLaP09qrrv8nem+oy5omOP7s1PsjUBTeWiaeJO+mB Xli4jH/JoZzTiTsW0d1e+FSf5GRcCIlrchkaI= Received: by 10.229.106.5 with SMTP id v5mr3113734qco.24.1294178550245; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.80.196 with SMTP id u4ls6142987qck.0.p; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.188.67 with SMTP id cz3mr1725331qcb.14.1294178549825; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.188.67 with SMTP id cz3mr1725330qcb.14.1294178549802; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey28si4126658qcb.7.2011.01.04.14.02.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ivo.doko@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.179; Received: by qyj19 with SMTP id 19so15529435qyj.3 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.95.211 with SMTP id e19mr19694674qcn.53.1294178548546; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.176.71 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:02:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c0687a1-deba-495a-9760-95d1d0649423@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <9114501.161.1294150198377.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhy19> <7c0687a1-deba-495a-9760-95d1d0649423@t8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:02:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language From: Ivo Doko To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: ivo.doko@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ivo.doko@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ivo.doko@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636427058a97e1404990c6c26 --001636427058a97e1404990c6c26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 4 January 2011 21:57, Lindar wrote: > I'm -not- going to vote for lojban. It has not been and definitely > isn't now a candidate auxlang. > I absolutely agree. I love lojban, but it is far from ready to be a serious auxlang candidate. Even Esperanto is a much better auxlang candidate than lojban at the moment - it's true that it's far from being completely irregular and logical and that it's only suited for people whose native language is an Indo-European language, but it's a fully defined, complete and functioning language, which lojban is very far from being at the moment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001636427058a97e1404990c6c26 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 4 January 2011 21:57, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm -not- going to vote for lojban. It has not been and definitely
isn't now a candidate auxlang.

I absolutely a= gree. I love lojban, but it is far from ready to be a serious auxlang candi= date. Even Esperanto is a much better auxlang candidate than lojban at the = moment - it's true that it's far from being completely irregular an= d logical and that it's only suited for people whose native language is= an Indo-European language, but it's a fully defined, complete and func= tioning language, which lojban is very far from being at the moment.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001636427058a97e1404990c6c26--