From lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBCmysPpBBoEZw-GfQ@googlegroups.com Fri Jan 14 16:09:52 2011 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PdtgP-0001SB-AZ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:09:32 -0800 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1sf1775930ywh.16 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=yaD5Uu0vrm/KnaGVD0J+QlaEx4XVUtQINBcLZlMGlsI=; b=dpsgqNQbM3fk9jJNhs+Z8FtwOdIc/BAmrJD2jlP8r0ygVyucKIChIqw8Wh2DQ0yYI2 fuvSOYPSkk9DqpQtztsLo4XrYCXlmEODgt57jwUFO1qKHDDwe2c5jwg7tUBIb94gAsJ4 FCbUFVVqek+Yy0iGBxD5/pqpHPhet90PoV2qs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=dNhw7cdGYTGQ8KGk0YR1F22JJVgl+mkmshaPNhsMGpHFlQUaXOXwtlZ/uUL0J0vCgf q46kfw/mpmbsk6naLB6oACzrBWbWhENmT6lgt9F4OsfyviolTHM/Io4C6KK3Tvc0kDMr u0OvEjBGanbaK9+OBvVFR6hpdUy3v9QcceUTk= Received: by 10.100.226.18 with SMTP id y18mr40806ang.76.1295050022362; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:02 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.56.38 with SMTP id e38ls581411ana.3.p; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.177.19 with SMTP id z19mr372374ane.8.1295050021704; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.177.19 with SMTP id z19mr372373ane.8.1295050021682; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com (mail-yx0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id w40si555170ana.3.2011.01.14.16.07.01; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.213.179; Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so1297685yxs.10 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.134.6 with SMTP id h6mr1870379ybd.123.1295050021172; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (236.sub-75-211-82.myvzw.com [75.211.82.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v6sm624628ybk.20.2011.01.14.16.06.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:06:55 -0700 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] will you help me understand BAhE+BU? Message-ID: <20110115000655.GA7283@236.sub-75-211-82.myvzw.com> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110113151853.GA2719@alice.local> <30518744.1220.1295049338465.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqfm14> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <30518744.1220.1295049338465.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqfm14> X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline That agrees with the concensus on the issue, between conversations here and an IRC. It is also the smallest change one can make for the PEG grammar and Magic Words document to agree. (It amounts to a clarification of ambigious language in Magic Words.) I've updated the wiki to state this. ki'e mu'o mi'e .alyn. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:55:38PM -0800, Lindar wrote: > I'm going to side with it being a letteral. > ba'e .ui do > I see it as {.ui} marking {ba'e}, which is pointing at {do}, making it > essentially the same as {ba'e do .ui}. > That's my retarded opinion. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.