From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCBg_jpBBoEspKIRQ@googlegroups.com Mon Jan 24 14:47:46 2011 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhVCH-0001iJ-TO; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:46 -0800 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf5386439wyb.16 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fwc4Ppg5FO7OIYb0NNcbYcMGn4+iPAwNpZVVpQYAXxs=; b=IWl0QT/BgtukPGlo/8DiGw55bJXZLichjnj607bJq5O/riyXg2aceXYbJSKPEIZe7j KnSXIDC6mhSb+SuDYpwBL/CTCaychYvOB4YOkR0OygY4oYkV4xjBrceuRyjN9HuLRJW1 0eEx5Btj4S6QE8cDAig+83LKCxjToaA3ETkBs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BJ4MJOBzpdKWfEXf802M6ADau51E23G2lXT2RRU+9BGHlC1r8Kbt5uOBtWcsn9dEkp pCDZCOzobDOzHkSFKhttbYv1s7YyhL9RFpnNHB0jzPR3eWSMqjHkdYzQLxlc9B5CyVmj IC4Si6gviGygTO7TMWJ25ovfZxbFM+ih823fQ= Received: by 10.216.123.74 with SMTP id u52mr429415weh.16.1295909249914; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:29 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.237.207 with SMTP id y57ls969751weq.0.p; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.83 with SMTP id z61mr182315wek.8.1295909248765; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.83 with SMTP id z61mr182314wek.8.1295909248725; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com (mail-ww0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l26si1416643weq.6.2011.01.24.14.47.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.46; Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so4820139wwj.3 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.146.142 with SMTP id h14mr5214223wbv.106.1295909247524; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.54.10 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110124162504.GB27137@alice.local> References: <20110124162504.GB27137@alice.local> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:47:27 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] zoi bug in camxes? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:25 PM, .alyn.post. wrote: > > According to example 10.3 in the CLL, the following statement is not > grammatical when written[1]: > > =A0mi djuno fi le valsi po'u zoi gy. gyrations .gy. > > camxes parses this anyway. =A0Is this a bug in camxes? If it's a bug, it's intentional. camxes will break the enclosed text into words as much as possible, and "gyrations" is a valid cmevla and cannot break into the two words "gy rations", so there is no way that the "gy" of "gyrations" can be taken as the closing ZOI delimiter word. In that position "gy" is not a possible word. If the example had been for example "zoi gy gyrate gy", then yes it would break, because "gyrate" is three cmavo "gy ra te". That would be a better example for what CLL is saying there. >=A0Should zoi > handling be detecting whether the zoi-open word is a substring of > zoi-word rather than testing for strict equality? The delimiters are supposed to be valid Lojban words, not just any phoneme string. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.