From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDanv3pBBoE7wxYNA@googlegroups.com Tue Jan 25 14:32:19 2011 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhrQm-0005xL-Nh; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:32:18 -0800 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34sf291487wwb.16 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RzLuQbLyCjrq7U7KgRS5tn4/d66N4gnTn833ccXrdn4=; b=RkfMKpWL8o4eDU/Z4YLSEg20GQ6R+BEvnbqXhFt9gIIH6iEPtvaraXiQCTndJfEM9u Gtk3EBVRk43KX3SoPlksot8m7SZcIOV5wbhA52STz3M7W4Vi3mkWSrKXVCpzxzydsL20 Lwi9tAHK62ydhgt8YiXAOKMkeH8iLggW4P/l0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NmpbLiKAHkl/MWscSme1Kmjg4PyYe9EV+tN2S1B6gmflX/+H/5BhOOD9nN+GmOckXL CogLjYWkGs2H5WfmEvYBSzzk1yBYL4xm8QDKclsoG48Dn2yBUkl9lzacJwo4zsXgo/dL I/fcnvIN7/aRfm0LUYr0jay8dmPgd384ikO48= Received: by 10.216.29.201 with SMTP id i51mr829732wea.6.1295994714481; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.15.136 with SMTP id f8ls513wef.3.p; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.178.13 with SMTP id e13mr26601wem.11.1295994713648; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.178.13 with SMTP id e13mr26600wem.11.1295994713635; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (mail-wy0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d66si1538989wej.13.2011.01.25.14.31.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.169; Received: by mail-wy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 26so348403wyj.0 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.144 with SMTP id z16mr6629684wbi.77.1295994711858; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.54.10 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:31:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110125222514.GD35838@alice.local> References: <20110125010006.GZ26224@digitalkingdom.org> <3251036.256.1295936084612.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcj39> <20110125070730.GB26224@digitalkingdom.org> <20110125171957.GF26224@digitalkingdom.org> <20110125173607.GA30364@alice.local> <20110125222514.GD35838@alice.local> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:31:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] zoi bug in camxes? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:25 PM, .alyn.post. wrote: > > Ah, I'm proposing to remove the !lojban-word from the > non-lojban-word production, as it is redundant -- non-lojban-word is > used in an ordered choice operator for which the preceding rule is > lojban-word, which obviates the need for it in that case. =A0That is > the only reference. In that case, I suggest changing the name of the rule to something more descriptive. I find it confusing to think of "mi", "klama" and "miklama" as "non-lojban-word"s. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.