From lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxCJ55HpBBoEtPPePQ@googlegroups.com Wed Jan 05 05:35:19 2011 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PaTWE-000406-Ns; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:19 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf8644404vws.16 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9gcJCsDbv6o77xV50w2+V204QffQl6tEzzO1smRCfo8=; b=ba2W7BSGrYW9jv+aMxLuqxc6ruqHOxCi5Dk5+EbDfy4yLuz7kCOHz4qbl9KCMsdA1/ Ui2dhrpna0+2e8C01kxjIA6FLqI1uyilLE2kA9l07T2VEuBt3BOjiz40aQZxBj3HySo8 Ky9qT4ApYBdoPdeHM53EAC6r+NyAQFsRO62aQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=JLHjpdFJo5Wx5Tg/dgJljgocdvETyYo3T44pFPWi9cCUC51mfPL9gKtRiTGI7bkSyn /juBpOtP00dkUUb8IadxHT0QW9TBEp/+mbiDQI1FE6MvACfVqnHT5pR4j8s1zU7j3DOJ SrlHWGedlMFmkwHfgbeRkwjl4lCtwfxvNUNY8= Received: by 10.220.201.77 with SMTP id ez13mr184566vcb.12.1294234505071; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:05 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.160.2 with SMTP id l2ls2045486vcx.4.p; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.176.10 with SMTP id bc10mr9641991vcb.24.1294234504042; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.176.10 with SMTP id bc10mr9641990vcb.24.1294234504019; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com (mail-qy0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3si2052707vbr.5.2011.01.05.05.35.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.178; Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so16285003qyk.2 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:35:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.99.130 with SMTP id u2mr20686389qcn.87.1294234088492; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.227.73 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 05:28:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3460195.1058.1293997919114.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prho17> <6f6f786d-3db8-4c42-9abf-7a69f510b8e9@i25g2000prd.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:28:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: larlermorna From: Remo Dentato To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b845c19d6d90499195b7a --0016363b845c19d6d90499195b7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/1/5 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: > > > > Lindar, I must have missed something. I wrote {vaigus}, {seikaix}, > > {gnoidkai} and {ftzi} and they all seems different and uniquely readabl= e > to > > me (see attached picture). > > Write them down on a piece of paper. Rotate the paper. There are four > possible readings. > > I now see what you mean, but this is an intrinsic flaw due to using simmetrical symbols. It could be alleviated by the type of decorations or b= y using a non symmetrical symbol for {ni'o} or for {.i}, ... --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0016363b845c19d6d90499195b7a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2011/1/5 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= jjllambias@gmail.com>=
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Lindar, I must have missed something. I wrote {vaigus}, {seikaix},
> {gnoidkai} and {ftzi} and they all seems different and uniquely readab= le to
> me (see attached picture).

Write them down on a piece of paper. Rotate the paper. There are four=
possible readings.


I now see=A0what you mean= , but this is an intrinsic flaw due to using simmetrical symbols. It could = be alleviated by the type of decorations or by using a non symmetrical symb= ol for {ni'o} or for {.i}, ...


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016363b845c19d6d90499195b7a--