From lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxDosLPqBBoEIXoppw@googlegroups.com Fri Feb 04 20:56:23 2011 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlaC3-0004gv-HR; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:23 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf1327472vws.16 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis :x-cloudmark-score:x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=8H0zSPtsgWolQ1tAjGX7F5MxmkHCKeIqi0egDni8lRY=; b=j65jBn2yoNebaXR45m1fK5patfS45hTMnbKdm0v7Os4ahq8DdEb0no84MpH5gF8uZ5 MGTi6zYG5J+qdt4SDbY0/HQ7hfKHUl2X7E+OtpgsP1IVfz6gD5xNVyL9k7keAxs1Kmsp DHiRifllsQuifwuyCgEbuLOV1qNv/FofQ4LAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=wY1TxWaJz2r/jp9QXWaCiq/AClpbCvS8qg3Au3qQGEBiJJIXLuY7/x730Q5hOg9clD RciRv1ymgVXsxtUOxn3v+M3TkEJyy5yW3ykze4mLFS56Q8WHGalxjtPTvUl6Xu1O2HYX Dl+osP9c/M+xMOM4QHjZaAUsUzHD8yGho7wT0= Received: by 10.220.192.193 with SMTP id dr1mr863253vcb.14.1296881768873; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.109.137 with SMTP id j9ls551210vcp.0.p; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.186.12 with SMTP id cq12mr3162400vcb.20.1296881767615; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.186.12 with SMTP id cq12mr3162397vcb.20.1296881767580; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.122]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id p11si204764vcf.10.2011.02.04.20.56.07; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.122; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=pepdxKapwHuwCZNFD5uob2wvham6E+RljB0uXw08FdQ= c=1 sm=0 a=SkViUY0jck8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=GP9p4K7AJb7bnZF3UFMA:9 a=7nOwZlDGZgSSDb8S2O8A:7 a=qxXK9b9Q0RpqxUkmm-Sf0pMzY2EA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:60112] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 95/15-19545-668DC4D4; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:56:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BAD1C3AC for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:56:05 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Error in DAG-CLL? 4.6 Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:56:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201102042356.04325.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 04 February 2011 20:25:51 Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > 6.15) na'e zei .a zei na'e zei by. livgyterbilma > non-A, non-B liver-disease > non-A, non-B hepatitis > > 6.17) na'e zei .a zei na'e zei by. zei livgyterbilma > non-A-non-B-hepatitis > > Shouldn't the {.a}s be {.abu}s? > > It seems to me that {na'e zei .a} refers to a logical connective that is > not "or". "na'e zei .abu zei na'e zei by" parses differently in jbofi'e than in camxes. In jbofi'e it's a tanru consisting of "na'e zei .a" and "bu zei na'e zei by". In camxes, if I'm reading the tree right, "na'e zei .a" is a lujvo, which is then converted into a letteral with "bu", then joined by "zei" to "na'e zei by". Pierre -- Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.