From lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxCwrbzqBBoEwaEfGg@googlegroups.com Sun Feb 06 13:46:43 2011 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PmCRI-0002uY-Ny; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:43 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf2107874vws.16 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis :x-cloudmark-score:x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=7avn6hwmTe7PnzBFznODhL1yifTr1T3Xl5mg5EFkcoE=; b=2Jg9InQJR358U4WvJtZGZuK3BIDDPBeWd/HFJztbdLoVVyD45yxCYit5cy6fp8ko1F YNtsLJ68B7sTSe29hQOhmc9cEx4pvXpWR1XB6Ud/YnQVIZS/SN0q1C1Ls40L6Ax6SMJM 8wL4lYAAz9LdHZLYLsrPLbPTtC0n7Tr+nz1eE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=3sMZjuRga/Xkb7pQPKXtrlY+JrjK60u70qIZ3Li/XbsHQXDIpke3w6RHBFMONXqlIL XbYJEsYwr9yamt1n1i0Oic6WcjVdTpRjNTr8pO8PVtAf5K5LEnfIfoMaBDKGCvYUxi4b KrTb87odRar/YIc3ZGlgOSsKB9JQnJmnUjBMc= Received: by 10.220.100.202 with SMTP id z10mr952809vcn.8.1297028784405; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:24 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.67.197 with SMTP id s5ls753499vci.2.p; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.181.69 with SMTP id bx5mr4125216vcb.2.1297028783484; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.181.69 with SMTP id bx5mr4125215vcb.2.1297028783467; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x13si428248vcr.7.2011.02.06.13.46.23; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.123; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=tLsyj04/L/SH/N6p42ldY6jXDYWe4pX5hAm6uRA1LKo= c=1 sm=0 a=6Vw-GGEYjH8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=TSBGp5a5gTI2xd3R0pcA:9 a=RPxjus74sg0NiIOLItoJBSZ_eaEA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:34522] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id D7/05-05134-EA61F4D4; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:46:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364D213FDB for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:46:22 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] [non]Dictionary form of lujvo Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:46:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201102061646.20030.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 February 2011 16:02:10 Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > For example, I like {tolcliva} better than I like {tolyli'a}. Is there a > convention stating that I should use the latter? There's a convention saying that each form gets a score and the scores determine which one is the canonical form. All the forms are equally valid; I prefer "tolcliva" too. I once used "ci'onrai" for scansion reasons. Pierre -- lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.