From lojban+bncCNSZ3eHoCBDG9arsBBoEpkND9A@googlegroups.com Wed Mar 23 20:30:29 2011 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2bFi-0004NT-0u; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:29 -0700 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3sf6348805gxk.16 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=+YKdeVne3GQl1mVx7o67KS4rrj6zFQK7m6pub8i6idU=; b=UE9bbGn++3orDCiYGY0lGXoDzfSIjM7Pwf6dr0u0Qmxq9t5ctBB+AaH7lMijMMcAdh 6DdpFYoWjTWCC0cGgMoJWTn6qlfAIUATjlSKO0ViHXle9ggQC1PBNdWvbhKtXEQPzxCY s1HVBlBnrLvqX43ir8AX6KXy7bJHbQozMg1ZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=bObvxs+3xDxIgrouwfA4eMpWwkju0hecOXwdh3QM14x0EBejxQ/vA7DY5CUCAHEcUi O/BK1lxAtwoLETCs+tZMhefzRSthZ1P6NnmqobWtQsFYwRyuvWQxU62+ke03GhfjK/Np W2y50zFriJTAiJKKGCSEFWIlKBUJp0m7he81k= Received: by 10.150.250.3 with SMTP id x3mr410891ybh.46.1300937414200; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.9.19 with SMTP id 19ls55682ani.5.p; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.6.12 with SMTP id j12mr3903044ani.5.1300937413385; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.6.12 with SMTP id j12mr3903043ani.5.1300937413359; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com (mail-gy0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28si3094299ana.10.2011.03.23.20.30.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.175; Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so3120993gyf.6 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.143.161 with SMTP id l21mr9760754yhj.355.1300937413222; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:30:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.146.168.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:29:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Frank Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:29:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] I'm sure I've missed it but, "ko" for "You and Me" ... To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: frankdmartinez@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=frankdmartinez@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30363de763e166049f32181e --20cf30363de763e166049f32181e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 .i'ocai .i ki'e rodo On 23 March 2011 21:56, .arpis. wrote: > In the interest of getting flamed and being convinced of a better way, I'll > present two of the things I've thought up. > > {doi mi'o ko klama le xotli} - {doi} explicitly assigns {do} to be {mi'o}, > so {ko} commands the speaker and the listener to go to the hotel; similarly > {ma'a} for the entire group. (gejyspa posted this before I finished my > reply) > > {e'u klama le xotli} or {e'u mi'o klama le xotli} - "Let's" isn't so much > an imperative marker as a suggestion marker. > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Frank wrote: > >> coi rodo .i >> >> I am sure it's in the CLL or L4B or maybe even this archives of this group >> but tcesteba if I can find how to say the multiple Person equivalent of >> "ko". For example, I can say, "ko klama le xotli" to say, "Make it so You >> go to the hotel" or "Go to the hotel". However, how would I say, "Let's go >> to the hotel"? I suppose in this case I am saying, "Make it so You and I go >> to the hotel". If it is in CLL or L4B or the archives, by all means, say so >> and I'll go look again. (And I apologize in advance if I have just >> completely missed it.) >> >> ki'e .i mi'e xuinkrbin. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf30363de763e166049f32181e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .i'ocai .i ki'e rodo

On 23 March = 2011 21:56, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
In the interest of getting flamed and being convinced of a better way, I= 9;ll present two of the things I've thought up.

{doi mi'o ko= klama le xotli} - {doi} explicitly assigns {do} to be {mi'o}, so {ko} = commands the speaker and the listener to go to the hotel; similarly {ma'= ;a} for the entire group. (gejyspa posted this before I finished my reply)<= br>
{e'u klama le xotli} or {e'u mi'o klama le xotli} - "L= et's" isn't so much an imperative marker as a suggestion marke= r.



On Wed, Mar = 23, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Frank <frankdmartinez@gmail.com>= wrote:
<= div class=3D"h5">coi rodo .i

I am sure it's in the C= LL or L4B or maybe even this archives of this group but tcesteba if I can f= ind how to say the multiple Person equivalent of "ko". =A0For exa= mple, I can say, "ko klama le xotli" to say, "Make it so You= go to the hotel" or "Go to the hotel". =A0However, how woul= d I say, "Let's go to the hotel"? =A0I suppose in this case I= am saying, "Make it so You and I go to the hotel". =A0If it is i= n CLL or L4B or the archives, by all means, say so and I'll go look aga= in. =A0(And I apologize in advance if I have just completely missed it.)

ki'e .i=A0mi'e xuinkrbin.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf30363de763e166049f32181e--