From lojban+bncCOib25n_BhDq2cvsBBoESJYu3A@googlegroups.com Wed Mar 30 01:42:33 2011 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4qz0-00068o-7d; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:33 -0700 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1sf2345942gyf.16 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RMc4sm5mQYhoIUxgcR4ypBsPzwMuBVHV9AOUAlYI5Zc=; b=lPjyWgqqb29d91I01qLESPwhF5e4GmYCsbS+tIOxym3A/oI+4ttI2hMw0UEEXilobt sO6SDQ9BLYZwbpFIiv/MuehcPKR44QRU9u7FwnXRQ5M3Hzemfd3y6gpNE8oU/NBViya9 Z243U8zQU9zwlWTb8VO6/TdHG2puSjyzDrA3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=ooGTZHvRBjQMacErSwCY+a59P7wGGmCL5L1CGUFUcLBLHuQjEG7WFqePmsgh/a4HR4 Q2PtEygXUn0widieRzUD6zj1kchwbCNtmksv5scD7ylTpG5pO0DGmFtWwd84yahaoN8H CmRR7/PobDOMd+Q7pOHowXjWxLmZ5D1jnFKQk= Received: by 10.150.227.6 with SMTP id z6mr248433ybg.59.1301474538661; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.67.68 with SMTP id q4ls491749ibi.3.p; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.6 with SMTP id fs6mr669248ibb.12.1301474537855; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.6 with SMTP id fs6mr669246ibb.12.1301474537814; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f170.google.com (mail-iy0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r31si1717961ibu.6.2011.03.30.01.42.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.170; Received: by iyb12 with SMTP id 12so2166915iyb.1 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.115.73 with SMTP id j9mr829682icq.117.1301474537624; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.42.173.71 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:42:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] Extensibility of vocatives (do'a non-selbri) From: ".arpis." To: Lojban X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dcc417fd5e1049faf27c0 --485b397dcc417fd5e1049faf27c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It all started with the simple question of someone asking me if {nicte xamgu} was a valid translation of "Good night." Sometimes, going off the deep end is fun. I recognize (or at least understand it to be the case) that selbri are as extensible as I could possibly want them. Since selbri can be converted into sumti, sumti are also as extensible as I could want. Is there a way that I can express a vocative which is a night parting? A water parting? A death parting? Is {ze'ei} the accepted way to do this, and are {nicte ze'ei co'o}, etc. valid uses? -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --485b397dcc417fd5e1049faf27c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It all started with the simple question of someone asking me if {nicte xamg= u} was a valid translation of "Good night."

Sometimes, goi= ng off the deep end is fun.

I recognize (or at least understand it t= o be the case) that selbri are as extensible as I could possibly want them.=

Since selbri can be converted into sumti, sumti are also as extensible = as I could want.

Is there a way that I can express a vocative which = is a night parting?=A0 A water parting?=A0 A death parting?

Is {ze&#= 39;ei} the accepted way to do this, and are {nicte ze'ei co'o}, etc= . valid uses?

--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--485b397dcc417fd5e1049faf27c0--