From lojban+bncCJGY6cDlFhCW8dbsBBoEi_6mtQ@googlegroups.com Fri Apr 01 04:36:09 2011 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5ce3-0006Q4-RU; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:36:08 -0700 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14sf2564883fxm.16 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=RZHH9fPefXbtAdWQKggWoZxbXq+vAUbwXBReHo+zYXc=; b=HHgtxTUvnsGa/8Ern2HlnvMIFqmoYy+mmeas2GfE6Vpww1kFdW8rTSMkrBQkaGEF7w GuzKQFa3UqV961YsvhDFfYE6PcjLNYFCUmVSoc3YNQKnjkaX+zu4caGAZxQNDmm5j0vh iQXUG8XPyca8TTqC56dH/7sqSnMlvB3dVWg9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=wQJonDgg6dKYpoTErGtfyZfbGAQhYOez4hk9m3smHvSNgwNDeDzWOVGBxIN4vl9j5C vHNcEFBLZJvgVPuRnb6LoflZLN5jU7p4ZmsDlFgihgcM3eEHUK9z2K5Yjmn1ZhTLQeHh Wkc/Ret8nXOs5MqjuYA4g4Nkepj4mlXy4pNQg= Received: by 10.223.99.65 with SMTP id t1mr421548fan.19.1301657750903; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.138.67 with SMTP id z3ls1328119bkt.0.p; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.83.12 with SMTP id d12mr537522bkl.16.1301657749642; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.83.12 with SMTP id d12mr537521bkl.16.1301657749619; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f42.google.com (mail-fx0-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j10si379036bka.4.2011.04.01.04.35.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.42; Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so5526493fxm.1 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.213 with SMTP id r21mr818997fag.54.1301657748270; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:35:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.141 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:35:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <917139.16117.qm@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Oren Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:35:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Extensibility of vocatives (do'a non-selbri) To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: Ivo Doko X-Original-Sender: get.oren@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=get.oren@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517473594b4709d049fd9cfc2 --001517473594b4709d049fd9cfc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 00:06, Ivo Doko wrote: > {.a'o xamgu nicte} Yea, that seems better... I was testing out .a'o and .e'u in my mind, testing their "contrapositives" to see which one seems most opposite of the English: .e'u xamgu nicte - [Why don't you have a] good night [, eh?] .e'unai xlali nicte - [Warning, caution, no] bad nights [, ya hear?] .a'o xamgu nicte - [Hopefully it'll be a] good night! .a'onai xlali nicte - [Oh no! It's bound to be a] bad night! Anyhow, I'm sharing because this exercise helped me prefer .a'o over .e'u. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001517473594b4709d049fd9cfc2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 00:06, I= vo Doko <ivo.dok= o@gmail.com> wrote:
{.a'o xamgu nicte}

Yea, that seems better...= I was testing out .a'o and .e'u in my mind, testing their "co= ntrapositives" to see which one seems most opposite of the English:

.e'u xamgu nicte - [Why don't you have a] good = night [, eh?]
.e'unai xlali nicte - [Warning, caution, no] ba= d nights [, ya hear?]

.a'o xamgu nicte - [Hope= fully it'll be a] good night!
.a'onai xlali nicte - [Oh no! It's bound to be a] bad night!

Anyhow, I'm sharing because this=A0exercise=A0h= elped me prefer .a'o over .e'u.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001517473594b4709d049fd9cfc2--