From lojban+bncCOib25n_BhC8-aztBBoEoD5LMg@googlegroups.com Sun Apr 17 12:17:33 2011 Received: from mail-yi0-f61.google.com ([209.85.218.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QBXTN-0002WG-1m; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:32 -0700 Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19sf8290816yie.16 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=sX20RhfvCIbyMaozfmDGD9f8wUHV95XwuB1gczee3E0=; b=AGsPX+WzkzpqqCvjrcsWocSQZ2VipfxP+hCCabD2rgJNd3NqI7EUcMiVD/0PdP7PjJ alMhIkX1ytBtgdOOuJUFmO4dTqtBFOKjRB8nTjTMSgKYHjVbh27rjCMfhbuRTybGgooG fQsdwrOPjcv+Q+Oo+1FRtt4pPGU2o1HEz1S5g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=e8eSWttjcyFvEohGEgK00Y6t3e9IyanNkbnEqsj87AcbBRSBhU5SCsY849PbXgIVb7 FTSPEPBQwuBwM/j2h0pHnVbBrZ/DYs2SC6sQQ5zHOoLTsSP1JCFozk/PLHS4qAjHxUrV A9/ivML809jew6Sq/FO+RM4y4HMQOa4Delg7w= Received: by 10.236.19.111 with SMTP id m75mr137808yhm.74.1303067836499; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.178.17 with SMTP id bk17ls1676048ibb.1.gmail; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.189.153 with SMTP id de25mr1903732ibb.14.1303067835507; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.189.153 with SMTP id de25mr1903731ibb.14.1303067835488; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f180.google.com (mail-iw0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dz6si1198708ibb.7.2011.04.17.12.17.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.180; Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so23426607iwn.25 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.55.84 with SMTP id vx20mr1580382icb.49.1303067835392; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.42.175.201 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:17:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] ua ui lo ciste be fi lo temge'a be bau la lojban cu melbi From: ".arpis." To: Lojban X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b1e2372616504a1221f13 --bcaec51b1e2372616504a1221f13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 First of all, is there a better way to say "tense" than {temge'a}? {.i pamai ma xu xauzma fi lo se cusku be fa lu'e zo'oi tense fe tu'a zo temge'a} I suddenly came upon this realization when I recalled a quote from the movie "La Fille sur le Pont" {.i mi suksa cfasanji ca lo mu'e mi morji lo te sitna be lo skina be me'e zoi fy La Fille sur le pont fy} I don't remember the exact quotation, but it has to do with being a target for knife throwing. {.i mi na satci morji lo te sitna .i ku'i ri srana lo za'i ce'u te renro lo dakfu} I became aware of the subtle differences between {lo te renro} and {lo ta'e te renro}. {.i mi pu co'a sanji lo milxe te frica lo smuni lu lo te renro li'u lo smuni lu lo ta'e te renro li'u} Forgive the crappy lojban; I'm just trying to practice. {e'o ko fraxu fi tu'a lo mi xlali jbobau ki'u lo du'u mi rapcreze'a} -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec51b1e2372616504a1221f13 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable First of all, is there a better way to say "tense" than {temge= 9;a}?
{.i pamai ma xu xauzma fi lo se cusku be fa lu'e zo'oi ten= se fe tu'a zo temge'a}

I suddenly came upon this realization= when I recalled a quote from the movie "La Fille sur le Pont" {.i mi suksa cfasanji ca lo mu'e mi morji lo te sitna be lo skina be me= 'e zoi fy La Fille sur le pont fy}

I don't remember the exac= t quotation, but it has to do with being a target for knife throwing.
{.i mi na satci morji lo te sitna .i ku'i ri srana lo za'i ce'u= te renro lo dakfu}

I became aware of the subtle differences between= {lo te renro} and {lo ta'e te renro}.
{.i mi pu co= 9;a sanji lo milxe te frica lo smuni lu lo te renro li'u lo smuni lu lo= ta'e te renro li'u}

Forgive the crappy lojban; I'm just trying to practice.
{e'o= ko fraxu fi tu'a lo mi xlali jbobau ki'u lo du'u mi rapcreze&#= 39;a}
--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec51b1e2372616504a1221f13--