From lojban+bncCKv97aq_GRDyr-zsBBoEn6kGgg@googlegroups.com Tue Apr 05 06:24:33 2011 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76Ey-0000Dv-5b; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:32 -0700 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14sf309342fxm.16 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=FaSssKxt8vYTP31XCf5tJ9I2xKzTNhj2rVCHxzhX4OU=; b=e6KquQmZlvmmuGDufH/HaOqzqB7SSe9qUtAGkOr3xW9igl/rGJ1IwY9cagRd+YJrQR rV+Qwc9sWP/AoAa6YmWl0/zV97xotl0OC0ls3w2Gfxyz3a2mIUQt78/pv8ujgRlYLMR/ 5UU+aRy+p+z7Ze7TXS8ws1HniFvUTFT/9ME5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=VzIZq9IUQUUZyuFCJW00igZvpLyFXlF9i9yDs46MJ9KcpObwMo6O2FT/HSw2wmOlBQ gs8OruLSin/cTYKk7j9mQM+hiq2sbzbz4KbgPPdvXKSbtf4Vuomq3CFLWqX1kYh04M+D piiHh/pNXvf/drD5aU+Xrw+pCfE+IB7dqnex4= Received: by 10.223.159.201 with SMTP id k9mr332950fax.47.1302009842832; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.35.21 with SMTP id n21ls2853442bkd.1.p; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.207 with SMTP id a15mr1095204bkc.3.1302009841646; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.207 with SMTP id a15mr1095203bkc.3.1302009841604; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (mail-bw0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e15si1084818bke.1.2011.04.05.06.24.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.41; Received: by mail-bw0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 17so442862bwz.14 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.133.91 with SMTP id e27mr3901944bkt.23.1302009841408; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.2.140 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0a74da06-07cf-4b52-a329-ed0ebbae2f5b@u8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:24:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: I love Lojban's approach, but what's the deal with place tags? From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lamelnyk@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747b844175cf304a02bca2f --00151747b844175cf304a02bca2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/4/5 Joel T. > The point I'm making about running two systems side-by-side is that in > any community of truly fluent people, either one of them would get > phased out, or they would diverge in meaning, usage, connotation etc. Anyone, ignorant enough, can mis(non?)understand some text, "spoken" by the people of a different ignorance level and/or kind, while still be able to communicate with ones of the same/compatible ignorances. That's why we read the "grammar" and the like kind of books. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --00151747b844175cf304a02bca2f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2011/4/5 Joel T. <joelofarabia@gmail.com>
The point I'm making about running two systems side-by-side is that in<= br> any community of truly fluent people, either one of them would get
phased out, or they would diverge in meaning, usage, connotation etc.

Anyone, ignorant enough, can mis(non?)understand some text, &qu= ot;spoken" by the people of a different ignorance level and/or kind, w= hile still be able to communicate with ones of the same/compatible ignoranc= es. That's why we read the "grammar" and the like kind of boo= ks.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--00151747b844175cf304a02bca2f--