From lojban+bncCK30vq5WEPfP4-4EGgSkjfyT@googlegroups.com Sun May 22 03:41:09 2011 Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QO65h-0002pT-DG; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:41:09 -0700 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4sf3046666pzk.16 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=aaCMB80y6NQgcPA1/UMccGDFOTLHxEiMfbBibE+lGyE=; b=O943BFy9liRzlMEbGm7ZVtDzbftbZxSKkC9OG2xCM5VxaQ4wVTsCq2nDnHC3cgDVAh 7ziIgy1df5c1VQsZP4JfLseNqnSesLmA5LAaDAfqxEhFt+Y8I+D9MpgZDtdvLJqzyigh HgyXdjZuyQe092xnZCdbcVBmUICtX3ru/Pk2U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; b=iFRSiCb4nP6O1xv07UrI2+qgzDpkyjQc5C4AGukcy+G9KgDNbkRL26cl5urAVSpFsb oMNp2VGnpsRBqTCeSwe3W7jWIrJZeKbau7E3KfxStoQXaghaAXoZXaZRmG7UqTMb0VXX WveSZcm6G1FA3KCv+8H2Clmm2xqfevrY5NaVo= Received: by 10.68.39.105 with SMTP id o9mr139968pbk.44.1306060791729; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.39.41 with SMTP id m9ls5806336pbk.2.gmail; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.63.100 with SMTP id f4mr297412pbs.47.1306060790902; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.63.100 with SMTP id f4mr297411pbs.47.1306060790846; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5si5725822pbf.2.2011.05.22.03.39.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 22 May 2011 03:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QO632-0002JN-Rn for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:38:33 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 03:38:12 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Non-suck android dictionary software? Message-ID: <20110522103812.GJ2577@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110522090038.GH2577@digitalkingdom.org> <2917485.3735.1306060049890.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbjl31> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2917485.3735.1306060049890.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbjl31> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 03:27:29AM -0700, najrut wrote: > >That's a deliberate design of jbovlaste, and has been like that > >since the very beginning. Since Lojban words cannot be polysemous, > >it makes no sense for a Lojban word to have two distinct meanings, > >so a 1-to-1 mapping is enforced for dictionary production purposes. > > Does this imply that a Lojban word has two distinct meanings ? > No! It means that one jbovalsi has one meaning, but two jbovalsi may have > the same meaning. > So this doesn't break lojban canon. Yes, I'm aware; I was explaining the historical motivation. Note that I didn't write it. > Actually what I need is not existing xml export. > All that I need is xml dump of jbovlaste. > Some time ago I asked you about sql dump but such dump turned out to be > cumbersome for automated conversion. > > So what I need is xml dump. > Or at least modification of existing mechanism that in addition exports the > following fields: > > - glosswords > - examples > - etymology > - vote infromation > > Sorry to mention but I'm not an expert in database management. Can't help. And I don't have the time, and no-one else wants to touch it. Sorry. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.