From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhDU9ZTvBBoEMb0Ppw@googlegroups.com Tue May 31 12:00:52 2011 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRUBK-0000Fi-Sh; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:52 -0700 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1sf6940451gyf.16 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uc67DvF1gEN3i3HPcZmutBHWWpQ1cQXe7xoNN8jlqB8=; b=SJ06LdZ0efp7y6FQwGFVRnYRlqUS1pWQV6lYzZKJVlumXeysMHkEfPl6YDrb7AnNW4 O/YC2aA5Lg3xcTtO1jvA96J8DCMuVqfn/Tz+6vALVFv3iUD6GUGs7U0ELiBfEv+fGKrD Ev14jqanVSObuc+Ok5R6beU8DV0DWsuXqhJOA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=5LPDqiVuUbKLzuVWtXggZElAGu0hIyfw7RjCO5R2sGsbwXG7NNVw1AJzz/cHxp8Itu 097ylTKiw9r6y8jopf+YpVBwhdzYA5giaBx7AKG81EaADXaGrA2Mxf9leSYWnrDHLL8L gGhAE+BESmkrHomw/7Gy6G4iPVpDkHrRbAGL0= Received: by 10.91.216.10 with SMTP id t10mr913115agq.0.1306868436298; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.91.144.7 with SMTP id w7ls861874agn.1.gmail; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.186.67 with SMTP id v43mr1100415yhm.45.1306868435651; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.186.67 with SMTP id v43mr1100413yhm.45.1306868435617; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f49.google.com (mail-qw0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p63si97900yhh.7.2011.05.31.12.00.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.49; Received: by qwi2 with SMTP id 2so3584115qwi.22 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.111.98 with SMTP id r34mr4832108qcp.3.1306868435306; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.34.83 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110531184223.GG11152@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110528045431.GQ11152@digitalkingdom.org> <20110528171828.GR11152@digitalkingdom.org> <20110528175221.GT11152@digitalkingdom.org> <20110531184223.GG11152@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:00:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] [nomik] pamoi javni From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Michael Turniansky wrote: >> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Robin Lee Powell >> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Alex Rozenshteyn >> > wrote: >> >> I thought someone suggested that the community as a whole act >> >> as a judge the first round... >> > >> > I didn't see that, nor does it sound like very much fun to me. >> > >> >> I'd be willing to judge, but I don't think I'm qualified... >> > >> > I don't think it matters. =A0 :) >> > >> > -Robin >> > >> >> mi radji'i lo du'u mi na jimpe s'uo da lo di'u te galfi be fi lo >> la pitr.subr. javni > > > "I admit that I don't understand the results of the last utterance > [by which I assume you actually mean Alex's rule posting, which is > not di'u] operating on the Peter Suber rules" > Not exactly "lo di'u te galfi..." is "the variant of Peter Suber's rules" pe di'u, i.e. associated with the last utterance. In other words, I KNOW you are using the "rules" set forth in the website below, but I can't make heads or tails of them. > ma'a na pilno lo la pitr.subr. javni .i m'a te javni fi la'o zoi > https://groups.google.com/group/frc-play/web/regular-ordinances-revised-o= ct-2007 > zoi > >> .i xu de ba torcki to bau la gliban toi > > vi'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.