From lojban+bncCKyEq_TBFBDxrYzwBBoE-KFg0Q@googlegroups.com Thu Jun 23 03:35:45 2011 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QZhG7-00061X-72; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:45 -0700 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3sf912247gxk.16 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=LXz2eNqIrT2erAUh8v7OU5uteg0GijM4Mb6ONuaF4/U=; b=n66yLC3zhjcVWCvZ1I3b9UKpQaLK+Xo1r5RaQ5tW9O44nC9oSa0Wh0fgVxid96mRcU PpWoxJcZ19dL7/lv+CzdL/Mx8QLVtgcypkOUcVI6dK+zLOXu7tSWdBtFiWpYIngqYPf3 7DUi52x/rf4A1KJhag13ClMQyWrKoKXfSoxLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=B0npjwFH52DWpAzMwPLgwrRBMuzTmOc4AfD+g+9ujgUYmK0ISwRXQes9suWzzdy6r/ eWS1IFAPuX7lM/SMeXs95GXlS+++kuoliydOa1P70czj8sUA4tfuuotclkZz2AEitEDO ocYfTWhdCohRE2KsZ+IFvdgd3TFmtyAxNINvE= Received: by 10.236.66.46 with SMTP id g34mr101326yhd.69.1308825329221; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.212.20 with SMTP id o20ls388163anq.3.gmail; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.86.11 with SMTP id o11mr177758anl.16.1308825327481; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Muhammad Nael Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <18295425.2260.1308825326908.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqie9> Subject: [lojban] How it should have been. And how it could be. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: muhammad.nael@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2259_7066545.1308825326907" ------=_Part_2259_7066545.1308825326907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Alright, I'm very much interested in the language but more so in its idea, I'm promoting a custom -not yet existing- form of it; so, my *looooong* list of questions is: For all the gurus and regular Lojbanists out there, imagine you're back where it all started, but with your current experience, how would you like Lojban to be? Or, imagine that you're using the current Lojban as a template for creating the perfect logical language (as close to that), how would you want it look like say, in year 2090? or a bit sooner if that's too far. What decisions do you know were made in the very initial years of Lojban that you wish weren't? is there any that you wish were *made*? and why? If possible give examples. - the change should be enriching Lojban's efficiency, making it easier to learn and moving it a step closer to being a complete language. I'll wait for replies, although I may not be able to make a reply myself today. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/ABNC8-RSBPUJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_2259_7066545.1308825326907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alright,
I'm very much interested in the language but more so in its ide= a, I'm promoting a custom -not yet existing- form of it; so, my looooong= list of questions is:
For all the gurus and regular Lojbanists out = there, imagine you're back where it all started, but with your current expe= rience, how would you like Lojban to be? Or, imagine that you're using the = current Lojban as a template for creating the perfect logical language (as = close to that), how would you want it look like say, in year 2090? or a bit= sooner if that's too far.
What decisions do you know were made in the v= ery initial years of Lojban that you wish weren't? is there any that you wi= sh were made? and why?
If possible give examples. - the change sh= ould be enriching Lojban's efficiency, making it easier to learn and moving= it a step closer to being a complete language.

I'll wait for replie= s, although I may not be able to make a reply myself today.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/AB= NC8-RSBPUJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_2259_7066545.1308825326907--