From lojban+bncCIfp7ILVEBDVoZHwBBoElG3Lzw@googlegroups.com Fri Jun 24 01:55:02 2011 Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qa2AB-0005qr-M4; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:55:02 -0700 Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22sf1566776pvc.16 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=MB0E7Tfmgj7ejhzju/IEoU41wgT9vl+odcsCPl6qb4A=; b=vNDANFPU40SXROcztOE+Fv8uOl9VXHbf0MXdu6Z4XcR+Pq3AprWCl8fUehHGQVgdXm LMuDw5FjCocf8Y7okKMHnZR0/IQB1cQuwvjymt14Z46usW6qdUAxu2o66ULzZ5gXTxpb 6TlXL/rPi8scmueXb54Y3akKWoLHBZ8dCCcGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=1kQy5nx4RuMsWFxIEBDwH7S4/p7VK5ChwjsScwn7jCMqw9v7DdiusRaPMnU4ukxUya 5nyw3820Kc4ocsNEN+Z+r88j8acmMhrh5ZpL+T2yviRbnF6muOF36Xh6jn/M9PxxuE22 IZoDG8oCIxyoQuSgsTH44fOj1DZQp2tTxfUts= Received: by 10.68.12.131 with SMTP id y3mr247735pbb.14.1308905685965; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.31.67 with SMTP id y3ls737129pbh.3.gmail; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.43.38 with SMTP id t6mr555295pbl.18.1308905684630; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.43.38 with SMTP id t6mr555294pbl.18.1308905684581; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pw0-f50.google.com (mail-pw0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c10si5225591pbi.2.2011.06.24.01.54.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.50; Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so1982020pwj.37 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.0.105 with SMTP id 9mr1634781pbd.346.1308905684245; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.48.102 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105012309.26265.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201105012309.26265.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:54:44 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] [CLL Errata] zo ra'o From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 2 May 2011 00:09, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Also there should be an example of "no'a ra'o". Here's mine: > > la djan. klama le zdani be vo'a pu le nu la meris. no'a .i > la djan. klama le zdani be vo'a pu le nu la meris. no'a ra'o > > In the first sentence; Mary and John both go to John's house; in the second, > Mary goes to her own house. > Isn't {vo'a} ambiguous and usually long distance? I think the examples would work better with {lonei} instead of {vo'a}. Anyway, I think that any example in which {ra'o} affects a pro-thing other than {mi}, {do} and personal friends is useful. > Also "ra'o" makes no sense with "du" and not much with "co'e" Of course it doesn't. These are not pro-bridi. > it's not clear to me how one should answer a "mo ra'o" question. Fun! Should we open a new discussion for that? On 2 May 2011 16:10, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 04:25:45PM -0700, .asiz. wrote: >> Apparently, someone noted that and proposed a correction in >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL%2C+aka+Reference+Grammar%2C+Errata > > Please make sure that page gets updated with whatever y'all decide. > Ok, I've put a note there. mu'o mi'e .asiz. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.