From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCD5Z3wBBoEfpRMmw@googlegroups.com Sun Jun 26 10:55:28 2011 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QatYL-00066N-UK; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:28 -0700 Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32sf5861890ywt.16 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:message-id:x-ymail-osg :x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=llw0Wy6LCLIHjvieMe3K5uI9RhVLUP2zg2BD8HHesMw=; b=zS+aXl2cRiIHQ1xDJ22uISYA0+zW9IFDRoC3gbXmF9RMz8c0TR4ws/BoMPb+ucMAOF c0Zf5PQNSex5qiInFokebldU11KILmEZCABCK1zVZ/I95I34qer/HI3npVhZqboi0Ik2 EDwIA0Al2n4kauJj6lt4P29OTEMZu7Z/BYj/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :message-id:x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=sem4TaV+d1mEpUi8797F4dKU+xP+JpCiDz2O92XsjDRazVHMev3ofh1ryVwhHi72iH Hi8bcKg+jq974wrwusoWWoAHIw8/B3R+3e16SXetKn+SMbmvZTx6z0x3p/IVyLiAQyA+ ZtXmbBHLE+HOtKR66giG8e6WC1IlvnqlZx3rU= Received: by 10.236.76.234 with SMTP id b70mr503210yhe.12.1309110915819; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.212.20 with SMTP id o20ls1068475anq.3.gmail; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.131.28 with SMTP id i28mr2729985ann.23.1309110914399; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.131.28 with SMTP id i28mr2729984ann.23.1309110914374; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm29.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm29.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.237.94]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id s16si4781308anj.1.2011.06.26.10.55.14; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.94 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.94; Received: from [66.94.237.197] by nm29.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2011 17:55:14 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.99] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2011 17:55:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2011 17:55:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 918295.9512.bm@omp1004.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 52531 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Jun 2011 17:55:13 -0000 Message-ID: <737600.87227.qm@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: L1aDeYEVM1n5at.3K1Lp0pLfO9ixNj_bj1t80dgwXcSgQ7n SxOuC_9cFkyGI57BfZCsNAWKNq0aETFgGKwD2PXuoy2B0HszkNM7wisP04LN ejYs4jD4xdGhOpIeSSsuf..vIRqbt7kV.fW5dwU80kVNIqI2MM_gTj7VMhb4 54h5apy7G3t13rSHdqKtv03L.LbZbaizUNA1z7aQKWdx0tEwKEh1pcYx3Szh ugaSw4JO0bOzK1O7lrrOdu31g.WmyLE73drF6p4KNDCY5vwZUVjLrIE8mCG4 er7fQKHYPzAzygqekZgUPB.Bp.G4eD6pv9hHIIiLJ0mIYhHE.NW2SmuQ.jX4 Gm6C4I9DPjUaVXlejltzIUaJR9ID7Caws9AkSskmGBJUpjsgOc5r.mJUDEeo vt1_NxG20O3c4bp60ub0qZLXusO5FR5eR312ncrVSrHW65rHUF3Pi2mKKP1b GUji480MsAv78dr4402tInBbwx9Bl7Oecv9WBXPzk Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:13 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: <18295425.2260.1308825326908.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqie9> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:55:13 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] How it should have been. And how it could be. To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.94 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1557335474-1309110913=:87227" --0-1557335474-1309110913=:87227 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is probably just a factor of our habits of word formation, whereby more precise words are longer, and then the psychology of Zipf's law come into play ________________________________ From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 12:34:29 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] How it should have been. And how it could be. The main way I expect Lojban to change in the coming years is to develop much more vocabulary. Particularly filling out the lujvo >space, and also probably more fu'ivla and I hope some interesting >zi'evla. Lojban feels like a language that wants to have a lot lot >lot of vocabulary. We insist that every word has just one meaning. >There's this sense that what you do is simply choose the word that >means exactly what you're actually saying. But so far we mostly have >these bland fuzzy gismu. I think Lojban will feel more like the >precise language we imagine it to be, with words directly capturing >all sorts of subtle flavors. People will always be saying, "You know >what I think is the perfect word to describe that?" and then pulling >out some rich obscure precise descriptive term. > >mi'e la stela selckiku mu'o There's a flip side to this in that essay by camgusmis about computer terms. Namely, good Lojban uses the least precise terms necessary to avoid confusion in context. I tend to agree with that side, other than with regard to things like jargon, or other highly specific things. mu'o mi'e .latros. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-1557335474-1309110913=:87227 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is probably just a factor of our habits of word form= ation, whereby more precise words are longer, and  then the psychology= of Zipf's law come into play


From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 12:34:29 PM
= Subject: Re: [lojban] How = it should have been. And how it could be.

The main way I expect Lojban to change in the coming years is to
develop much more vocabulary.  Particularly filling out the lujvo
space, and also probably more fu'ivla and I hope some interesting
zi'evla.  Lojban feels like a language that wants to have a lot lot lot of vocabulary.  We insist that every word has just one meaning. There's this sense that what you do is simply choose the word that
means exactly what you're actually saying.  But so far we mostly have<= br> these bland fuzzy gismu.  I think Lojban will feel more like the
precise language we imagine it to be, with words directly capturing
all sorts of subtle flavors.  People will always be saying, "You know<= br> what I think is the perfect word to describe that?" and then pulling
out some rich obscure precise descriptive term.

mi'e la stela selckiku mu'o
There's a flip side to this in= that essay by camgusmis about computer terms. Namely, good Lojban uses the= least precise terms necessary to avoid confusion in context. I tend to agr= ee with that side, other than with regard to things like jargon, or other h= ighly specific things.

mu'o mi'e .latros.
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-1557335474-1309110913=:87227--