From lojban+bncCKyEq_TBFBCcjqjwBBoERu8AxA@googlegroups.com Tue Jun 28 10:00:40 2011 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbbeN-0007Dr-Ic; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:00:40 -0700 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3sf375674gxk.16 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=V++tzVNQun2HLZcHBp26y8woc2DbF9YnOgWpCITTqZg=; b=mOzDiVwskiMKrIH/0YVXqiKmyiNmXpbDH0o2z8qvX28vbmOBYT6OM/q1zwBjIGk9ZK yYUW45ZPbZUabrWXSfwJq4Xnp1dVHWzFpncgDimGDyHLjmFSF3fvQH9W3SiuPcFnMozX jvfPogT4pBMdkOsPYfE9uQdqtWFvpMivdczu4= Received: by 10.236.153.231 with SMTP id f67mr827913yhk.5.1309280028337; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:53:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.91.73.27 with SMTP id a27ls200073agl.3.gmail; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.195.28 with SMTP id x28mr851004agp.3.1309280025879; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:53:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Muhammad Nael Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <6680585.1597.1309280025515.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqdx5> In-Reply-To: <1309277686.79313.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: How it should have been. And how it could be. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: muhammad.nael@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1596_30262673.1309280025514" ------=_Part_1596_30262673.1309280025514 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm aware of Lojban's multi-language origins, but just saying that it used 'algorithms' isn't enough. The rest of your post says clearly that it was so complex for 'normal' available word generation software or -to explain in a post for that matter-. For *priori* languages however, do you know of a good *offline* pattern based word generator? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/taehN3q92iMJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_1596_30262673.1309280025514 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm aware of Lojban's multi-language origins, but just saying that it used = 'algorithms' isn't enough. The rest of your post says clearly that it was s= o complex for 'normal' available word generation software or -to explain in= a post for that matter-. For priori languages however, do you know = of a good offline pattern based word generator?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/ta= ehN3q92iMJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1596_30262673.1309280025514--