From lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhDZotnvBBoE1RPSbg@googlegroups.com Mon Jun 13 11:05:28 2011 Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QWBVr-0001ku-Oo; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:28 -0700 Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20sf3233628vxk.16 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=HhBMTyr86JnR0mj5xtAuJnPXIIJt0YlNrz1anO1r7Dw=; b=tUxLUdy4ZasKrAa4mJyD2nPJ52hnTmxHo0OBhxmniJUhbghh0nIei12vxXEmgHhTl9 AFWrtRAlTlQ0ybPwXoiJGkvty4Nrfbio0kY4CCkLUmTR4KcjXUWSjLVlP3jq6clZVNtH IU8KZvVXpFjKJKcIX7Uy3AhySmArgGtGrnrjI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=3ZGUPhp/Gd3H62t4ZnDChMJoDs8dXct6YzMDYlFdrCbwlmcnknVuJ1y8KOrsIIzVsc cn+hf0KZi1Yu773y0Su8MeKxG518Yec6OC0dJKgFvCxKBC163xi2Y49JVpTQ5/fGO8AL Y8Yd9pI/E0wR22eGib4Ghfb1aIQKZLeHSYmgo= Received: by 10.220.20.68 with SMTP id e4mr618428vcb.38.1307988313587; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.96.197 with SMTP id du5ls1984770vdb.1.gmail; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.105 with SMTP id b9mr1279730vdw.23.1307988312407; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.105 with SMTP id b9mr1279729vdw.23.1307988312398; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com (mail-qy0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ch6si5410995vdb.2.2011.06.13.11.05.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.169; Received: by mail-qy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 2so1073749qyk.7 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.43.232 with SMTP id x40mr4144787qce.32.1307988312228; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.49.198 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110613174139.GT9936@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20110613174139.GT9936@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Hey xorxes: I need some tutoring. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > So I'm getting back into some seriously Lojbanning (I'm talking in > #jbopre pretty regularily, and almost entirely in Lojban), and > something came up, which was "lo lojbo ka'a prenu", which seemed odd > to me, and then I noticed the "lo rozgu cu xunre" example at > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri > > So, I believe that "lo rozgu cu blabi" is also perfectly fine, and > I'd like to explain (again, I know; I'm asking as an unreasonable > favour :), either here or on IRC, how that works. > > In particular, is xorlo {lo rozgu} do'a like {su'o rozgu} except > without the implications about existence and distributivity and so > on? > > ta'o I thought of translating the above, but I've no idea what I > mean by "In particular,", and I don't feel like disecting it right > now; others should full free, though. > "In particular -> "su'anai" --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.