From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCJ5uzwBBoEWWNcKg@googlegroups.com Mon Jul 11 10:29:59 2011 Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QgKIu-0006Zi-DA; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:59 -0700 Received: by vxg38 with SMTP id 38sf3074930vxg.16 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-smtp:x-ymail-osg :x-yahoo-newman-property:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eSbEmvXC/Cg3ly2gYM4hTaAaIUlz8zMGr8A4pRqg8WM=; b=Y6n3qsx6OGJ3XFx2K4zLYSwdcneB5kR9dNUtjl2RgKWhbxDEhitwpDIqJfWB47xcxY 4rnxd6PkXO0bYRH7oAi538qDj1Jz4fLZ7aH5m+TcnfMD3swLHe/KN06cvdRS353Lae/2 plQXyZMnfeTRlUb/Wrq9QF3O5PIel1lEvzpQ4= Received: by 10.221.1.11 with SMTP id no11mr589850vcb.13.1310405385182; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.161.199 with SMTP id xu7ls650628vdb.0.gmail; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.90.50 with SMTP id bt18mr1544833vdb.27.1310405383045; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.90.50 with SMTP id bt18mr1544832vdb.27.1310405383031; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.136.86.55]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id a10si10994850vdt.0.2011.07.11.10.29.42; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.136.86.55 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.136.86.55; Received: (qmail 90051 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 17:29:42 -0000 Received: from [10.0.42.224] (kali9putra@199.36.244.11 with xymcookie) by smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 10:29:42 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- X-YMail-OSG: iGKLB9kVM1kbXDNG32nYxv_4lW0o00BhwiAkeZCJ2zI4Tqf 12bsDfgclxIXUBOzELH2tftpNsvLIAU.knhENGOS1YritUNFF.TLGe7JomDL v59cL27jm3Mch6omH00kBZ2GTJIN14vz9Ifjz9b8kySTJUMkel5yTousARlQ nsDzF8bCKY2m9bivc67jYTP44SRg_tVFBXcdYZoA_mvfoWGmznEBgx_YGkx8 EOZSoW_coaYS0QAjq4OtAHeDAZydeFq4OELJC0R8ho6JLL2ZJJwGwK6XAWAm zux_5oEJTSUDQnZ6Z6lTEiFwZmXfbpKecADNvvdwZYy2Ei5jz20OdvKa5ayv ff7.gYNPzJ8UJgz594mMHL4WXh6ECSrxeCObPqKgeedRr4q_IsZoIEOgY_qm CU_4W2zNtnoJ7tQB6dLhFDSQUNwJLvYLGZOGqT5is.SyLsmrNrGcYbyjsiGH OA1.xepq8ly49l.SoYm8- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 References: <201107090028.31171.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4E1A7244.2080107@kli.org> <7C93C87E-FBFF-4C18-A7D2-525EBF6BB974@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: <19C496C1-8E20-4FCE-A40C-2634CC26D4AC@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_9277079_AHnHjkQAABgaThsOKwvPxVF8ERA Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: xu dai Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:36:03 -0400 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.136.86.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--761400143 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-1--761400143 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, that makes sense, sorta. I wouldn't have take 'xu' as an attitudinal= , for one thing -- it is too clearly syntactic for that (cf. 'ma'). For an= other, that usage is hardly what the comments on this thread suggest, which= are more along the lines I suggest -- with exceptions, I admit. Sent from my iPad On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:52, ".arpis." wrote: >=20 > I'm trying to figure all the various discussions under this label out. L= et me summarize what I understand and then set me straight. > 1) Since 'xu dai' makes little sense literally, I take it it is an idiom = of some sort, apparently meaning "What is the appropriate UI to use here, w= ith reference to someone else?", I.e., "What would contextually defined so = and so have used at this point in this sentence --suitably edited?" So= , 'mi xu dai klama?' asks you what someone (contextually you, again, but I = supposed there is a way to assign it otherwise) would have said in the fram= e 'do ... klama.' (or maybe, in this case, 'la pycyn ... klama'). The corr= ect answer is presumably something like 'zo ui' ( with an appropriate choic= e of UI). The answer which seems to be given is 'ui', which clearly wrong = in two ways: it is now an expression of the respondent's response to being = asked the question (or something like that) and not someone's response to m= y coming and b) if it were to be that it would be deceptive since it would = not actually express that emotion (in the usual case) but rather simulate i= t after it had gone away. >=20 > I disagree with this interpretation of {xu dai}. Just like {ui dai} ascri= bes happiness to the listener, {xu dai} ascribes questioning to the listene= r. This is little use except as a rhetorical device, but AFAICT it's the on= ly consistent interpretation. > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --Apple-Mail-1--761400143 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Well, that makes sense, sorta.  I= wouldn't have take 'xu' as an attitudinal, for one thing -- it is too clea= rly syntactic for that (cf. 'ma').  For another, that usage is hardly = what the comments on this thread suggest, which are more along the lines I = suggest  -- with exceptions, I admit.

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:52, ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:


<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I'm trying to figure all the various discuss= ions under this label out.  Let me summarize what I understand and the= n set me straight.
1) Since 'xu dai' makes little sense literally, I take it it is an idiom of= some sort, apparently meaning "What is the appropriate UI to use here, wit= h reference to someone else?", I.e., "What would contextually defined so an= d so have used at this point in this sentence --suitably edited?"   &n= bsp;  So, 'mi xu dai klama?' asks you what someone (contextually you, = again, but I supposed there is a way to assign it otherwise) would have sai= d in the frame 'do ... klama.' (or maybe, in this case, 'la pycyn ... klama= ').  The correct answer is presumably something like 'zo ui' ( with an= appropriate choice of UI).  The answer which seems to be given is 'ui= ', which clearly wrong in two ways: it is now an expression of the responde= nt's response to being asked the question (or something like that) and not = someone's response to my coming and b) if it were to be that it would be de= ceptive since it would not actually express that emotion (in the usual case= ) but rather simulate it after it had gone away.

I disagree with this interpretation of {xu dai}. Jus= t like {ui dai} ascribes happiness to the listener, {xu dai} ascribes quest= ioning to the listener. This is little use except as a rhetorical device, b= ut AFAICT it's the only consistent interpretation.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--Apple-Mail-1--761400143--