From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRCSq_zwBBoELQx05w@googlegroups.com Thu Jul 14 09:13:19 2011 Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QhOXN-00040Y-Cc; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:19 -0700 Received: by vxg38 with SMTP id 38sf271287vxg.16 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=JS/LYghJ1UBPtalROVWMI2MaiG1GVNFvXNzMdV+MCxA=; b=wGktGl5swDHRdclY6wyu1kO8p4LIrV4obcOzxgrqrFGzreLDMqiju2ylQMZENi5LXC ADCsqzQNI0CjCGubdeLKrIyTDZ5ua46OE2+Bk9T1NF7Ky1XK3sNYrWSKWDXUng0HaeJo krdTDDDNPegFa2SLCIxk5/TQ/8+rAoLCoCnsA= Received: by 10.220.186.1 with SMTP id cq1mr439709vcb.51.1310659986463; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.221.12.4 with SMTP id pg4ls120543vcb.4.gmail; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.184.72 with SMTP id r48mr1273032yhm.24.1310659985223; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.184.72 with SMTP id r48mr1273031yhm.24.1310659985209; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm12-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm12-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.236.11]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id p47si187937yhl.2.2011.07.14.09.13.04; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.11; Received: from [66.94.237.200] by nm12.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2011 16:13:04 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.103] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2011 16:13:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jul 2011 16:13:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 843053.36499.bm@omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 41070 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jul 2011 16:13:04 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: J5B5dt0VM1lhXvKtNiCiSG_vzvZahwbwFI2IeexJYgGOzNd Gbcux5vbO00y69DdJkdQq1_h87_wqr3UkQbsEIz3fZEbTBHXXMImGFWRh5RR G1bggOhXXURC_R_3GtpH.g3JnWM3cxX6y84cVOzGcbixaoPZ6SFlSKzUaNkg y2vQj2q90YDgMsF35dmJSc9IfRsrgMOqqK2cHuxx8sie7ojpJhoRarrndsyy IUSkTHowBzqS2zjwulaHZrFTETtw6bLlgvZ.BhZWdgbqMlNvsdCCpBozwyn2 Iey.hbmY8o9xzjmA12ZvoDHpcq6x4HalhG2.Iy0ENA54ximFWY5Qb5glQGGs ShCrnKZZsicx7Z.6DDhid1IToRwKFP0MOnnjlvn6oG4OZEqQyYtqkM7mMp32 Txee2QDd_zdwzaAS3MAwz1ZuCISprHaTGRfCIaBecfIJ1H5WeJWZ2awWJl9R X_bacPkToz01l_RwautCDecg71Kp1cLQCNyz4criG Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:04 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740 References: <201107090028.31171.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4E1A7244.2080107@kli.org> <7C93C87E-FBFF-4C18-A7D2-525EBF6BB974@yahoo.com> <19C496C1-8E20-4FCE-A40C-2634CC26D4AC@yahoo.com> <55A3224A-D4C3-48D6-9114-692063F6D2B8@yahoo.com> <1310438893.88955.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1310579153.44690.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7E28C065-4C52-4DE5-9487-6A780891EA26@yahoo.com> <1310651160.55516.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1310659984.29791.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:13:04 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: xu dai To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-722492760-1310659984=:29791" --0-722492760-1310659984=:29791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yup! But I still only get a little over 10 m. Go figger! However, assuming that xorxes' reading of 'xu dai' is licit and the target usage is fairly common, I wonder about applying the same to other directive language. What about 'ko dai'? Grammatical dissimilarities aside, the function is essentially the same. To be sure, the obvious versions for this usage "I hear you asking me to" (900k) and "I hear you telling me to" (1.8m) are not as common and in many cases they are about real commands that the speaker is commenting on (the first several entries are for a song with a line like "I hear you asking me to be strong Cause relief is on the way" or so), which I did not see in the question cases -- but then I didn't read all that many. Eventually we do get down to projected commands that I either want to do or want to object to before they are actually raised. This seems to me even more ridiculous than 'xu dai', but I don't see how to stop the slide once it goes beyond attitudinals. ________________________________ From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Thu, July 14, 2011 8:58:02 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: xu dai Actually, if you put a search in quotes it will search for that specific expression and not just word1 AND word2 AND word3 etc... So when xorxes said that he got 50,500,000 hits for "I hear you ask" (it's up to 50,700,000 now for me) he means that that specific expression comes up that many times not just pages containing all those words. And all results on the first page are close fits for the usage that xorxes describes. On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, John E Clifford wrote: Well given the frequency of "I" and :you" and probably of "hear" and "asking". >and given the quirks of search engines, I am not too surprised at 50 million >"hits". But you have come up with at least one case that actually used the >expression, and I suppose there are many (not a million, though) more. [snip] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-722492760-1310659984=:29791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yup! But I still only get a little over 10 m.  Go fi= gger! 
However, assuming that xorxes' reading of 'xu dai' is licit= and the target usage is fairly common, I wonder about applying the same to= other directive language.  What about 'ko dai'?  Grammatical dis= similarities aside, the function is essentially the same.  To be sure,= the obvious versions for this usage  "I hear you asking me to" (900k)= and "I hear you telling me to" (1.8m) are not as common and in many cases = they are about real commands that the speaker is commenting on (the first s= everal entries are for a song with a line like "I hear you asking me to be = strong Cause relief is on the way" or so), which I did not see in the quest= ion cases -- but then I didn't read all that many.
Eventually we do get down to projected commands that I either want to do or want to object = to before they are actually raised.  This seems to me even more ridicu= lous than 'xu dai', but I don't see how to stop the slide once it goes beyo= nd attitudinals.


From: Luk= e Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, July 14, 2011 8:58:02 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: xu dai

Actually, if you put a search in quotes it will search for that specific ex= pression and not just word1 AND word2 AND word3 etc...
So when xorxes s= aid that he got 50,500,000 hits for "I hear you ask" (it's up to 50,700,000= now for me) he means that that specific expression comes up that many time= s not just pages containing all those words.

And all results on the first page are close fits for th= e usage that xorxes describes.

On Thu, Ju= l 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well given the frequency of "I" and :you" a= nd probably of "hear" and "asking".
and given the quirks of search engines, I am not too surprised at 50 millio= n
"hits".  But you have come up with at least one case that actually use= d the
expression, and I suppose there are many (not a million, though) more.
  [snip] 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-722492760-1310659984=:29791--