From lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRD4z6zxBBoEbrO-vA@googlegroups.com Sat Jul 23 12:59:16 2011 Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QkiLi-0001tf-B3; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:59:15 -0700 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3sf3318328gxk.16 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FXX8zVyVs0LWmoLjHwH0uKBeVYOAjwCaTkrFt5NecS8=; b=s+HiVZqGYrmkGCopum3RPnsaPsaHLlfY3rAJAG2b8+ptHggYVaju3Gj/CxwjHuk1wP Tc/sGh4VWixNBQLUS/4/tnjZHM5ghZrS6Hh0pQWt22V/QhyMSfQxINHCOa2F62KAgI2+ nnlSEK88ymEHUF8n3CjWLXu4sw4hQGAO3eosw= Received: by 10.146.60.32 with SMTP id i32mr305940yaa.25.1311451128117; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.155.26 with SMTP id h26ls1919680ano.0.gmail; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.182.194 with SMTP id o42mr1468567yhm.192.1311451126961; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.182.194 with SMTP id o42mr1468566yhm.192.1311451126909; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm4.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm4.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.237.205]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id n19si3836847ani.0.2011.07.23.12.58.46; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.205 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.205; Received: from [66.94.237.126] by nm4.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.123] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1028.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 521449.72185.bm@omp1028.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78729 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: b.eacF0VM1nxYWYWC4SkglsTxjQGIkwQBF6jATbRM8qOA.m h4mmVdYU4WpH2xZ1A0fIZDa4lcLhX4VUbokZ5VCAbkUKqzCx.OsAwZos0rpO mTs36HX5Ug0Y80JB82LMPbiX8CSGWP8nPITpulXnYyRCprdhBPm_CHKOy8ga yW2dHXF8hmHBPAETEfO0Vt4O8_RVLV4z69WkIcaq9wROv2M31W_EX27.vnie CKh.hH9Mo_rzgYjwrBig0zQ2hPWkXaeqz.zGLDbENkaT605_DwkQFDWFJGtw 0hkv5XYqT25SNUpV0L_xtubjmy9Tek5_RuCgkzSxAV_jBtCsmsqP185qpqIP QFHkSnMSO8WtfsfQ7lSAKv4SoexuficuAUeG.2MUwL66lkuPvtgwbmOv2IjG dyH9oQlg3MStZSLCAHEfZzpT1hfQXBNW4YltSZmhieDJG3Dd404ZCz9UOAPv BbY05elGQCCFSA5H84mGo0xXrV11b7VpCnLyNxJEveA-- Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740 References: Message-ID: <1311451126.77488.YahooMailRC@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] groupyness in definitions To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.205 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-397289224-1311451126=:77488" --0-397289224-1311451126=:77488 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I suspect it would help to figure out what it says in English first. "a is miscellaneous/assorted/mixed in property b" First of all, b is presumably a generic property, although I suppose it could be specific (some members have it, some don't) or scalar. Next, we can't do much with taking members of the set one at a time, since there may be several members of a which are the same with respect to b but different from some others (I happen to be ingesting my favorite snack, Necco Wafers, which is in each package an assortment of disks of seven different flavors, even though there are thirty or so disks in a package). So, the simplest way to define 'vrici' is "not uniform in b" "there are two members of a which are different with respect to b", though we might require more variety or at least more members that differ. ________________________________ From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, July 23, 2011 1:21:57 PM Subject: [lojban] groupyness in definitions I was thinking about how one would define "vrici" in lojban (I've since looked it up and xorxes has already done this). But at the time, I came up with something like {ro xyxipa cu frica ro lo drata xyxipa lo ka xyxire}. Then I thought some more about it and started wondering if that {drata} was really doing what I wanted it to. If we're talking about {ro lo broda} then we're saying "all of those things that broda which are within the scope of our discourse". But now if I say "ro lo drata broda" that "other"ness is being applied to the "broda" and then we take "all of that". Is there a way to say "all of the things in xyxipa taken as individuals are different from each of (all of the things in the set xyxipa minus itself as individuals) in property xyxire". I'm clearly not well-versed in talking about groups and individuals and whatnot but I hope I've at least gotten the root of my question through. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0-397289224-1311451126=:77488 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I suspect it would help to figure out what it says in English = first.  "a is miscellaneous/assorted/mixed in property b"  First = of all, b is presumably a generic property, although I suppose it could be = specific (some members have it, some don't) or scalar.  Next, we can't= do much with taking members of the set one at a time, since there may be s= everal members of a which are the same with respect to b but different from= some others (I happen to be ingesting my favorite snack, Necco Wafers, whi= ch is in each package an assortment of disks of seven different flavors, ev= en though there are thirty or so disks in a package).  So, the simples= t way to define 'vrici' is "not uniform in b" "there are two members of a w= hich are different with respect to b", though we might require more variety or at least more members that differ.


From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com&g= t;
To: lojban@googlegro= ups.com
Sent: Sat, July= 23, 2011 1:21:57 PM
Subject: [lojban] groupyness in definitions

I was thinking about how one would define "vrici" in lojban (I've since loo= ked it up and xorxes has already done this).  But at the time, I came = up with something like {ro xyxipa cu frica ro lo drata xyxipa lo ka xyxire}= .

Then I thought some more about it and started wondering if t= hat {drata} was really doing what I wanted it to.  If we're talking ab= out {ro lo broda} then we're saying "all of those things that broda which a= re within the scope of our discourse".  But now if I say "ro lo drata = broda" that "other"ness is being applied to the "broda" and then we take "a= ll of that".

Is there a way to say "all of the things in xyxipa take= n as individuals are different from each of (all of the things in= the set xyxipa minus itself as individuals) in property xyxire".

I'm clearly not well-versed in talking about groups and= individuals and whatnot but I hope I've at least gotten the root of my que= stion through.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0-397289224-1311451126=:77488--