From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBCgy7nyBBoElZhKqA@googlegroups.com Fri Aug 19 06:31:27 2011 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuPAQ-0006OV-Li; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:26 -0700 Received: by wwf4 with SMTP id 4sf6299403wwf.16 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0xcbvjqgNMW9nGrvsrWrTvfY8voRfKLhq2bOQjCKrvE=; b=Fhpgqa6hX3mNYQ6dNYj1hGWCpvZk4SK75ZPB+34OUK43FK6Ij79zRaADsUXCne83k8 KS0BsTOJNCUN29Pqetaql+QXypTx9aqDsGb2YsPNNVd0ncVTF9g4F0FTRZamuOnUFifz NOoaaaEOs7XBkiIz7pK84XOfZDPw6qi7thecE= Received: by 10.216.186.5 with SMTP id v5mr202750wem.25.1313760672444; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.200.140 with SMTP id ew12ls12116768wbb.3.gmail; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.39.18 with SMTP id d18mr295722wbe.0.1313760671368; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.39.18 with SMTP id d18mr295721wbe.0.1313760671344; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (mail-ww0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fh14si5285203wbb.0.2011.08.19.06.31.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.43; Received: by wwe32 with SMTP id 32so2560241wwe.24 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.233 with SMTP id y83mr567580weq.9.1313760671091; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.163.14 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:30:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Luke Bergen Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:30:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175774161ecadd04aadbbec0 --0015175774161ecadd04aadbbec0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't think "ia" is a legal diphthong outside of UI. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: > I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is > reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short > rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is > incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both > {-zen-} and {-ze'a-}. > > I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any > way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi? > > remod > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015175774161ecadd04aadbbec0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't think "ia" is a legal diphthong outside of UI.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is
reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short
rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is
incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both
{-zen-} and {-ze'a-}.

I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any
way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi?

remod

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--0015175774161ecadd04aadbbec0--