From lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxDP17nyBBoEhFUagA@googlegroups.com Fri Aug 19 06:57:47 2011 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuPZw-00067o-W4; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:47 -0700 Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6sf4437339ywa.16 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=o7HGMzWcvGFgXyUR3QihwhKxtpa17qCLwtSMHoyS4Wg=; b=MQPSUsOctnjX3Xuequ+Vnm/IilgYNPAU3zh9vc1U/EtqRqDxQTjVwE0sxIkSDkpKJB IarOZeQXlJcr4qqoL/BOpq9Nz8dAsnlZ1mn+NF/4GVhrGePMt8GLFgtZECKZNdQTaB6A EMQMoaCR753u37QbhtKbEaMno/ePKV68zcp4g= Received: by 10.150.218.10 with SMTP id q10mr242102ybg.24.1313762255547; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.41.5 with SMTP id t5ls466691anj.2.gmail; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.189.12 with SMTP id m12mr2029630anf.34.1313762253779; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.189.12 with SMTP id m12mr2029629anf.34.1313762253752; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com (mail-yi0-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w9si3938072anp.0.2011.08.19.06.57.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.218.47; Received: by mail-yi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 28so2290151yia.20 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.253.19 with SMTP id a19mr2343329agi.25.1313762253636; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.165.199 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:57:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi From: Remo Dentato To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > I don't think "ia" is a legal diphthong outside of UI. I forgot about the diphtong restriction (I had to chect CLL 4.6). All the other possible short rafsi are taken then :( Why is that restriction in place? Is that because, without "ia" being a diphtong, {jia} is two sillable? I wonder if this is a morphological restriction we could eliminate in the future ... remod. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.