From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBCh_rnyBBoEvGfVCw@googlegroups.com Fri Aug 19 08:20:16 2011 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuQrk-0001XK-PO; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:15 -0700 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26sf6399837wyj.16 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=yzwrTk10CxF4LrcnAemk/XpyOKnWbHxaVknzuSrf6CQ=; b=zh7GFMgju4freyg5q0fmmgma7bp1R79N9zh9LcQHN0anZURPf+PpjIXMpwHkGoZWhL o2fm/bHEJYwDkuR3eTyW+Z4Aoo7EpuXN1iGIfxYtIXLBpJk0ynclrJcS+IfwXajm+o6l mXIDTdNx3IQNjuNaLRvyMQbCmLmBbdVL8WXps= Received: by 10.216.133.208 with SMTP id q58mr273720wei.22.1313767202635; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.106.37 with SMTP id v37ls12797355wbo.1.gmail; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.138.11 with SMTP id z11mr172502wei.10.1313767200615; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.138.11 with SMTP id z11mr172501wei.10.1313767200590; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (mail-wy0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q28si5420314wbo.2.2011.08.19.08.20.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.171; Received: by mail-wy0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 13so2533363wyh.30 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.80.14 with SMTP id j14mr2229711wee.9.1313767198089; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:19:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.163.14 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:19:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201108191102.45178.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201108191102.45178.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Luke Bergen Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:19:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f423b228e0be04aadd4363 --001485f423b228e0be04aadd4363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 http://bit.ly/eXxBrM .u'i zo'oru'e On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 19 August 2011 08:11:48 Remo Dentato wrote: > > I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is > > reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short > > rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is > > incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both > > {-zen-} and {-ze'a-}. > > > > I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any > > way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi? > > "ia" does not occur in lujvo. It does occur in fu'ivla, cmevla, and cmavo. > > Pierre > -- > li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --001485f423b228e0be04aadd4363 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://bit.ly/eXxBrM=A0 .u'i zo= 9;oru'e


On Fri, Aug 19, 2011= at 11:02 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 19 August 2011 = 08:11:48 Remo Dentato wrote:
> I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is > reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short=
> rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is
> incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both<= br> > {-zen-} and {-ze'a-}.
>
> I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any=
> way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi?

"ia" does not occur in lujvo. It does occur in fu'ivla,= cmevla, and cmavo.

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--001485f423b228e0be04aadd4363--