From lojban+bncCJbznvHdFRCgiaTzBBoEkaAsew@googlegroups.com Thu Sep 08 11:08:44 2011 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R1j1l-0004RZ-M3; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:44 -0700 Received: by wwf4 with SMTP id 4sf264196wwf.16 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SBSes7x26lEDq3E/gYsV5o6V++AUKrK3YrApUs8IDQo=; b=aQckNU+HbxHfq86WinWHoR4Y0zliZD+C1vI0Yzl9DDto9k/y6cIyXLwY2dgbITNldh 1sRT6tW2kGoG22STHzrmKP/LfYmOpYX3hZWXWazA1RnAtC6mp3ERgPBb2EIXov/w5Ogi 8ppesPyv1uo37Yzrc7Ar8V1NTLWUv8ZHwDOoM= Received: by 10.216.49.75 with SMTP id w53mr427342web.21.1315505312996; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.24.77 with SMTP id w53ls306008eew.3.canary; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.144 with SMTP id y16mr227197ebc.7.1315505311700; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.144 with SMTP id y16mr227196ebc.7.1315505311668; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com (mail-fx0-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m9si324898faf.0.2011.09.08.11.08.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.45; Received: by mail-fx0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b27so2495383fxb.18 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.58.209 with SMTP id i17mr238030fah.22.1315505310134; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:08:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.75.197 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:08:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6fed5e9c-dac9-4e73-8974-de6e9add112c@a31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> References: <6fed5e9c-dac9-4e73-8974-de6e9add112c@a31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] last week To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174737c4b5f3db04ac71f2b7 --0015174737c4b5f3db04ac71f2b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'll make a first attempt. On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, djandus wrote: > So, I noticed that the phrase "next week" has a very excellent lujvo: > http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/bavlamjeftu > My question is in two parts. First, is {lidne} the proper antonym of > {balvi}? I think {balvi} has two antonyms, {lidne} and {purci}. > Second, is li'elamjeftu a good lujvu for "last week"? > No. Since the stress is on "jef", there would be no difference between {li'elamjeftu} and {li'e lamjeftu}. To overcome this, add a hyphen-r after {li'e}: {li'erlamjeftu}. But, based on the analogy of {bavlamdei} ('tomorrow') and {prulamdei} ('yesterday'), I suggest {prulamjeftu}. stevo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015174737c4b5f3db04ac71f2b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'll make a first attempt.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, djandus <jandew@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
So, I noticed that the phrase &q= uot;next week" has a very excellent lujvo:
http://vlasisku.lojba= n.org/vlasisku/bavlamjeftu
My question is in two parts. First, is {lidne} the proper antonym of
{ba= lvi}?
=A0
I think {balvi} has two antonyms, {lidne} and {purci}.
=A0
Second, is li'elamjeftu a go= od lujvu for "last week"?
=A0
No. Since the stress is on "jef", there would be no differen= ce between {li'elamjeftu} and {li'e lamjeftu}. To overcome this, ad= d a hyphen-r after {li'e}: {li'erlamjeftu}.
=A0
But, based on the analogy of {bavlamdei} ('tomorrow') and {pru= lamdei} ('yesterday'), I suggest {prulamjeftu}.
=A0
stevo
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015174737c4b5f3db04ac71f2b7--