From lojban+bncCNCCoMTMDhC-w7PzBBoEeonGYQ@googlegroups.com Sun Sep 11 09:28:57 2011 Received: from mail-gx0-f186.google.com ([209.85.161.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mtp-00063r-Ga; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:56 -0700 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1sf3516570gxk.13 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1V0uA1CmhPRrd29yol9vgOb+cq17LulPbXDsMutoxcQ=; b=D9n2sarBngQ1ZBKT/EeiqaBvHN/woyd0kyYLo97GbItBa0+xo9bjh2XchvnobxMv1u WH+rHzxswXP2WBP4mgN6K3xbtR2XJQQY4S0sCDORO2VafNHDDyYTMmnm0jAP5kClCWSQ xKFDthcREB2t7JKhpgcvBrVGorJgTV9VVn6JM= Received: by 10.147.62.17 with SMTP id p17mr551941yak.1.1315758526016; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.181.40 with SMTP id i40ls14832895anp.0.gmail; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.95.9 with SMTP id x9mr3132587anl.39.1315758525360; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.95.9 with SMTP id x9mr3132586anl.39.1315758525341; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (mail-gy0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t26si6981954anp.3.2011.09.11.09.28.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of selckiku@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.179; Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so2894017gyg.24 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.73.38 with SMTP id v38mr339003yba.448.1315758525183; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.98.19 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stela Selckiku Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:28:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Next thursday To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: selckiku@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of selckiku@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=selckiku@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > lo do cusku cu clarai ja lujrai .i mi na jimpe piso'e se cusku .i.e'o ko > ke'usku bau lo glibau vi'o > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Stela Selckiku wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Jonathan Jones >> wrote: >> > as long as everyone involved uses this method, their is no possibility >> > of confusion, >> >> .i nibli .u'i .i ku'i je'u du'e za'a ciste cu zasti .ui nai .o'u nai >> ru'e .i .e'u ma'a cfari krefu pensi jvofi'i .i .ia nai lo nu tanru >> finti cu drani mi'e la jvopa'i .u'i .i zo'o nai lo tanru cu na'e mapti >> .i steci smuni .i ma'a djica lo nu na'e cfipu .i li'a li'a sai cfipu >> lakne tcini .i mutce filtterjmi lujvo nitcu pe'i .i mi nelci lo steci >> djedi bo kancu lujvo .i bavlamdei .i za'e relbavlamdei .i za'e >> cibybavlamdei .i ju'o cu'i na'e drani tarmi .i ku'i do la'a jimpe fi >> lo sidbo be fi mi LOL, that's tautological. Really, though, there's too many systems. :( I suggest we invent lujvo by thinking again from the beginning. I don't believe that tanru are correct-- Signed, Lujvo Luver, lol. Seriously, though, a tanru doesn't fit. An exact meaning. We want there to be no confusion. Clearly, quite clearly, this is a situation prone towards confusion. Very easily understood lujvo are needed, in my opinion. I like the specific day number lujvo. Tomorrow. Day after tomorrow. Day after the day after tomorrow. Maybe that's not the right shape. But you probably get my idea. >> ni'o le cfipu pe zoi .gy. this .gy. cu na'e nambi ma'a za'a .o'u .i lo >> bavlamji cu bavlamji li'a lo cabna gi'e na prulamji .oi .i .ia lo nu >> jbobau pensi cu me la'o .gy. Sapir-Whorf .gy. ka'u rinka lo nu frili >> finti The confusion with "this" isn't a problem for us, I see, phew. A future-next thing is next in the future, clearly, of a contemporaneousness, and not past-next (Oy vey!). I think if we just think Lojbanically, it'll Sapir-Whorfly cause us to be able to invent easily. >> mi'e la stela selckiku >> mi'e la jvopa'i to ki'e la zgana ku noi te cmene toi >> mi'e .telselkik. >> mu'o I'm Lock Keyopened. I'm Lujvolover (Thanks to Observer for the name!) I'm lockkeyopened over. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.