From lojban+bncCOjSjrXVGBDl9MfzBBoE818LBQ@googlegroups.com Thu Sep 15 06:15:32 2011 Received: from mail-yi0-f61.google.com ([209.85.218.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Bmn-0004Ai-Ia; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:31 -0700 Received: by yih13 with SMTP id 13sf3050152yih.16 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=MmygIVogsNTpb4wvstW2gGN0vUd9EAtL0k86yxhCurY=; b=Y+371v0NK77fN33pIA04/6LuBlO40HE19kdfZME7bVUeb/FPb5y5MbLI695RMCMRb1 BP7x6DqsbZ9j3H86inn/zXpMnVcw0ix/XyaTbaNE4lVqn4vf1CLDrLbzDyL4cmwU+n/g EeBfk4gqSjhGGLpS7DesssP5qmR9wMUp+crNw= Received: by 10.236.9.105 with SMTP id 69mr347859yhs.17.1316092517960; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.91.102.4 with SMTP id e4ls4655975agm.5.gmail; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.191.136 with SMTP id g8mr5127108yhn.4.1316092517177; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.191.136 with SMTP id g8mr5127106yhn.4.1316092517163; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h45si840814yhe.6.2011.09.15.06.15.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.181; Received: by gyd10 with SMTP id 10so2714058gyd.26 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.156.197 with SMTP id m45mr2207993yhk.15.1316092516841; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.95.44 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.95.44 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:15:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <16652326.909.1316078107123.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqgn17> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:15:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] fun pun? From: Luke Bergen To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303b4091f53aa304acfaaa2b --20cf303b4091f53aa304acfaaa2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Or something like {noroi} On Sep 15, 2011 8:12 AM, "Ian Johnson" wrote: > Eh, {milxe} is troubling too, I guess. I suppose just {to'e cafne} is about > the only one that is clear. > > Incidentally, I should say that the second sense does make a degree of > sense. > > mu'o mi'e latros .i .u'u mi co'e li re > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ian Johnson wrote: > >> I find it to be a stretch, since {milxe} is so much more appropriate for >> the first meaning than {cmalu}. >> >> .i ku'i .u'i .i .a'o cilre lo drata lo nu do ctuca fo la lojban .i mu'o >> mi'e latros >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:15 AM, djandus wrote: >> >>> In teaching my class, a fun exchange was made while covering {be} and {mo} >>> >>> I first asked Henry how he liked me: >>> doi .enrin. do mo nelci mi >>> To which he responded >>> mutce >>> >>> Then I took things further >>> Me: mi mo gletu le mamta be do ku >>> H: cmalu .a'o >>> Where he intended "Not much, I hope." >>> >>> The fun pun part comes when we thought about applying {cmalu} to >>> describing {le gasnu poi gletu zi'e po'u lo pinji} >>> >>> My question: Does this really work as a Lojban pun? If so, awesome! If >>> not, why? >>> >>> mu'o mi'e djos >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "lojban" group. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4Z-amuS6WpcJ. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf303b4091f53aa304acfaaa2b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Or something like {noroi}

On Sep 15, 2011 8:12 AM, "Ian Johnson"= <blindbravado@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
> Eh, {milxe} is troubling too, I gues= s. I suppose just {to'e cafne} is about
> the only one that is clear.
>
> Incidentally, I should sa= y that the second sense does make a degree of
> sense.
>
&g= t; mu'o mi'e latros .i .u'u mi co'e li re
>
> = On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I find it to be a stretch, since {milxe} is so much more = appropriate for
>> the first meaning than {cmalu}.
>>
= >> .i ku'i .u'i .i .a'o cilre lo drata lo nu do ctuca fo = la lojban .i mu'o
>> mi'e latros
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15= , 2011 at 5:15 AM, djandus <jandew@g= mail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In teaching my class, a= fun exchange was made while covering {be} and {mo}
>>>
>>> I first asked Henry how he liked me:
>&g= t;> doi .enrin. do mo nelci mi
>>> To which he responded
= >>> mutce
>>>
>>> Then I took things furth= er
>>> Me: mi mo gletu le mamta be do ku
>>> H: cmalu .a= 'o
>>> Where he intended "Not much, I hope."
&= gt;>>
>>> The fun pun part comes when we thought about ap= plying {cmalu} to
>>> describing {le gasnu poi gletu zi'e po'u lo pinji}
= >>>
>>> My question: Does this really work as a Lojban= pun? If so, awesome! If
>>> not, why?
>>>
>&= gt;> mu'o mi'e djos
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message b= ecause you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "lojban= " group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4Z-amuS6WpcJ.
>>&= gt; To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> = lojban+unsubscribe= @googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group a= t
>>> http= ://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>>>
>><= br>>>
>
> --
> You received this message because = you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this gro= up, send email to = lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den= .
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf303b4091f53aa304acfaaa2b--