From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDA8IjzBBoEdVk_9w@googlegroups.com Sat Sep 03 07:23:07 2011 Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzr7g-0007Zz-C8; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:23:07 -0700 Received: by vxh7 with SMTP id 7sf2015101vxh.16 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SA91H7+XR17PxXHFvd9X1gn1bXh1r7MQoxOGKkqIsjk=; b=mnBpyTOOnrIFFGzT7AYUCu8Hetur1ArxU84ABO24rwlGE2MG0MfMO/HEIy6eGvS7FC fDxoUzimJJBgZ1D+w51JUnBVy1geuJXRAFRE2d11uFKyP64pu2mmpxMJugxAeFRa7P43 6c3MNxhn2tQt54T72DvjhAMtcLnQj3QFP6MLA= Received: by 10.220.115.5 with SMTP id g5mr365909vcq.29.1315059776465; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.161.134 with SMTP id xs6ls2167233vdb.0.gmail; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.99.232 with SMTP id et8mr892147vdb.18.1315059775677; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.99.232 with SMTP id et8mr892146vdb.18.1315059775669; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f49.google.com (mail-vw0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ea4si1131602vdc.2.2011.09.03.07.22.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.49; Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so3644031vws.36 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.176.169 with SMTP id cj9mr2080319vdc.117.1315059775575; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.163.133 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:22:55 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] re'o vs ne'a From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:57 AM, tijlan wrote: > > Why should "ne'a" belong to the "Contact Spatial" category? The section is not very well named. The only one that really requires contact from that section is "re'o". And most of the FAhAs not in that section allow contact as well. > How is "ne'a" different from the traditional "vi"? One difference is that "mo'i ne'a" is grammatical but "mo'i vi" is not. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.