Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:46253)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhDMqsL1BBoE2kQfvg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RLP8P-0004nw-2Q; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:57:01 -0700
Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4sf11868351pzk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-spam-score:x-spam_score
         :x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:sender:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=zJTega8jPavIhvXHxjBFEAQpegD++JpT3f5diqSVUmo=;
        b=J1Ts5nXtLjtmOylZqBVcz92nrSo4fECs9XeVMZkbMIPbzsrkv5RvPnY4Vz3qLlnC9s
         4vFLdT2nDFbxb/SjQ3wlZoWISZ7Y2cOp0l0LyokcJ/IABvaS3bN1BhOWEVCZtRH4yc6b
         8jy85DmXiejnPdM9bK7EV+M0zYiMyjOLpY9oA=
Received: by 10.68.9.103 with SMTP id y7mr418635pba.7.1320195404576;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.74.5 with SMTP id p5ls290435pbv.7.gmail; Tue, 01 Nov 2011
 17:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.0.170 with SMTP id 10mr2146160pbf.2.1320195403565;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.0.170 with SMTP id 10mr2146159pbf.2.1320195403555;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si834283pbe.2.2011.11.01.17.56.43
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RLP8E-0004nt-Au
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:42 -0700
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53]:48558)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <eyeonus@gmail.com>)
	id 1RLP89-0004nc-Du
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:42 -0700
Received: by faai28 with SMTP id i28so8961588faa.40
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.17.23 with SMTP id q23mr4475238faa.11.1320195389725; Tue,
 01 Nov 2011 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.1.7 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111102003244.GK15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20111101095715.GD15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
	<CAMKwHj3uP4bGXzZATpzyZYaE8fkWGNQxUOiUvXz8X=1De+6rDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111102003244.GK15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:56:29 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMKwHj1++qbdGF9-=Q6FAjysteJvKazP7Cg8dyTQ6KJ+Y7UYRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Use fu'ivla more (was Re: [lojban] Supporting Lojbanic babies.)
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.8
X-Spam_score_int: -7
X-Spam_bar: /
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org; dkim=pass (test
 mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517447a423d1c2404b0b5f187
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--001517447a423d1c2404b0b5f187
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Robin Lee Powell <
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:06:38AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Robin Lee Powell <
> <snip>

I don't see why you think fu'ivla or cmevla are
> > preferable to lujvo, though.
>
> Lujvo should only be used, IMO, when you need more than one place
> from the relevant gismu.  If all you *actually* want is "x1 is a
> foobie [of type x2]", that's a fu'ivle or cmevla.  I can imagine
> that a word for "labour contraction" with an actual interesting
> place structure could be made ("x1 is having contractions x2 minutes
> apart lasting for x3 minutes each" OSLT), but it's far from
> necessary, and none of those places leap out to me as being gismu
> places *anyways*.
>
> IOW, if you can't look at the *place structure* and say "that's a
> place from gasnu, and that's two places from krici, and that's two
> places from kubli", then what you have is not naturally a lujvo
> style place structure, and you should consider not using lujvo.
>
> Many many many specific/technical terms people try to make lujvo for
> shouldn't be, IMO.  Pretty much all computer stuff, for starters;
> "x1 is a motherboard" is all you want out of a word for
> "motherboard", which means you're not going to use any of the places
> of the 5 gismu you tacked together to make a lujvo for that, so it
> shouldn't be a lujvo.
>
> When you only expect to need the word for this current conversation,
> you can and should (IMO) use cmevla instead.  "ry lifri pa la
> kyntraktcyn" is (if that's a legal cmevla) perfectly fine for one
> conversation; unless we're starting the Lojban obstetrical
> department, who fucking cares?<snip>
>

I see your point. However, my objection to fu'ivla specifically isn't
related to that at all- I dislike them because they are ugly and/or
difficult. To the best of my knowledge, all fu'ivla are either easy to
make, but ugly and difficult to pronounce, like {cidjrspageti} and the rest
of it's type, or else require a great deal of effort to make in such a way
as to not be ugly and difficult to pronounce.

I have no objections to the use of cmevla- heck, my name is one. :)
However, regarding your point about words in which we would only ever care
about the first place, such as with motherboard, I personally prefer the
idea that .xorxes.(?) suggested about allowing cmevla to be used a selbri,
with the default meaning of such being "x1 is a (member of) <cmevla>":
i.e.; {ti (cu) .materbord.} = "This is a motherboard."

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--001517447a423d1c2404b0b5f187
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Robin Le=
e Powell <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rlpowell@digitalkingdom.or=
g">rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:06:38AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:<br>
&gt; On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Robin Lee Powell &lt;<br>
&lt;snip&gt;</blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left=
: 1ex;"> I don&#39;t see why you think fu&#39;ivla or cmevla are<br>
&gt; preferable to lujvo, though.<br>
<br>
Lujvo should only be used, IMO, when you need more than one place<br>
from the relevant gismu. =A0If all you *actually* want is &quot;x1 is a<br>
foobie [of type x2]&quot;, that&#39;s a fu&#39;ivle or cmevla. =A0I can ima=
gine<br>
that a word for &quot;labour contraction&quot; with an actual interesting<b=
r>
place structure could be made (&quot;x1 is having contractions x2 minutes<b=
r>
apart lasting for x3 minutes each&quot; OSLT), but it&#39;s far from<br>
necessary, and none of those places leap out to me as being gismu<br>
places *anyways*.<br>
<br>
IOW, if you can&#39;t look at the *place structure* and say &quot;that&#39;=
s a<br>
place from gasnu, and that&#39;s two places from krici, and that&#39;s two<=
br>
places from kubli&quot;, then what you have is not naturally a lujvo<br>
style place structure, and you should consider not using lujvo.<br>
<br>
Many many many specific/technical terms people try to make lujvo for<br>
shouldn&#39;t be, IMO. =A0Pretty much all computer stuff, for starters;<br>
&quot;x1 is a motherboard&quot; is all you want out of a word for<br>
&quot;motherboard&quot;, which means you&#39;re not going to use any of the=
 places<br>
of the 5 gismu you tacked together to make a lujvo for that, so it<br>
shouldn&#39;t be a lujvo.<br>
<br>
When you only expect to need the word for this current conversation,<br>
you can and should (IMO) use cmevla instead. =A0&quot;ry lifri pa la<br>
kyntraktcyn&quot; is (if that&#39;s a legal cmevla) perfectly fine for one<=
br>
conversation; unless we&#39;re starting the Lojban obstetrical<br>
department, who fucking cares?&lt;snip&gt;<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>I see your point. However, my objection to fu=
&#39;ivla specifically isn&#39;t related to that at all- I dislike them bec=
ause they are ugly and/or difficult. To the best of my knowledge, all fu&#3=
9;ivla are either easy to make, but ugly and difficult to pronounce, like {=
cidjrspageti} and the rest of it&#39;s type, or else require a great deal o=
f effort to make in such a way as to not be ugly and difficult to pronounce=
.<br>
<br>I have no objections to the use of cmevla- heck, my name is one. :) How=
ever, regarding your point about words in which we would only ever care abo=
ut the first place, such as with motherboard, I personally prefer the idea =
that .xorxes.(?) suggested about allowing cmevla to be used a selbri, with =
the default meaning of such being &quot;x1 is a (member of) &lt;cmevla&gt;&=
quot;: i.e.; {ti (cu) .materbord.} =3D &quot;This is a motherboard.&quot;<b=
r clear=3D"all">
<br>-- <br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e .aionys.<br><br>.i.e&#39;ucai ko cmima lo piln=
o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&#39;o<br>(Come to the Dot Side! Lu=
ke, I am your father. :D )<br><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--001517447a423d1c2404b0b5f187--