Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:42906) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBxv-0005TG-Kv; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:34 -0800 Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf8922597iag.16 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-spam-score:x-spam_score :x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:sender:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+5C+eX/Wmbxks6LO7YBUMzK4Bdw7VBuWLEJ5PKvG26g=; b=1GPpn8c1+NhWfdZuREDG95flGsLKIoN02bQkgcD8f2CZ1z4whNnzunEelTW+wHqaw0 PVtwWrKNlaXluXnYoUCA95qY+TzII50kEoldTt2D0IYg2LhlZc6LCtLAheDOJ4XyIdI+ b3vPd2lkQR36Uy677y84w2mE7KzZYCxHBYMdQ= Received: by 10.50.41.198 with SMTP id h6mr2976745igl.2.1320621439016; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.63.137 with SMTP id b9ls13317772ibi.0.gmail; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.133.135 with SMTP id h7mr37713509ict.4.1320621438317; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.133.135 with SMTP id h7mr37713506ict.4.1320621438304; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3si14036054pbd.0.2011.11.06.15.17.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBxk-0005T6-Pl for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:16 -0800 Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53]:56846) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBxj-0005So-BV for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:16 -0800 Received: by faan15 with SMTP id n15so1941813faa.40 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.148.165 with SMTP id tt5mr5387489lab.23.1320621427797; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:17:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111106230135.GM21434@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111106230135.GM21434@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:17:07 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, sort of: catlu vs. zgana From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.8 X-Spam_score_int: -7 X-Spam_bar: / Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > What's the difference here? =A0In particular, what does {catlu} > actually mean? =A0Is it just like {zgana} but without a particular > sense and conditions specified? catlu =3D troci lo nu viska zgana =3D troci lo nu ganse > Which word is best for intent scrutiny? =A0How would you emphasize > intent-ness there? "Intent scrutiny" or "intense scrutiny"? catlu/zgana both require intent. I'm not sure what "intent scrutiny" means. I think "lanli" might be better than catlu/zgana for "scrutinize". "Intense scrutiny" could be "lo nu carmi lo ka lanli". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.