Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:36806) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShcMM-00031h-Lx; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:23 -0700 Received: by daek18 with SMTP id k18sf372655dae.16 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=l60+7YF8J1yQFVbetemRx/wbWkYee+aQZlNKEi9qa+s=; b=nzwTQ1Sj8bNlsqg/pDf8o9R/FEfphnyUpPq8FPDHjepEeBhvn1HCjAgTEFqKNa3waK YKAvbCZz22G0T2tlBjJbjNbDcP1RRduFh8GYJfvT0hKSsSkbPabL2/nMsymWBgd3Hxwx nQetU6bHnwPIXBcLItht/AHYIHqjEioyYppHQ= Received: by 10.52.179.98 with SMTP id df2mr1845558vdc.3.1340264880375; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:48:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.230.193 with SMTP id jn1ls59847vcb.8.gmail; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.52 with SMTP id n20mr1308078vdj.4.1340264878991; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:47:58 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <9cb9e4c0-f3fa-4183-8582-f14de670148c@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2996_24832813.1340264878544" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2996_24832813.1340264878544 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:01:13 AM UTC+4, Escape Landsome wrote: > > > Stop being an asshole. We all know that Lojban has problems. You're=20 > harping=20 > > on this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, [SNIP]=20 > > and you can stop bleeding the wound.=20 > > You don't need to be blunt.=20 > > You react like a believer whose faith is attacked.=20 > > In any case, I don't attack YOU, nor even your "faith", but would you=20 > say that a man that would complain to Russell about problems with the=20 > set y =3D {x | x =E2=88=89 x} would be "an asshole" ?=20 > > Well, he would be if you take the things too much emotionally, but I=20 > rather think he would be a great scientist.=20 > > Here I point the necessity of adapting the mechanism of redundancy in=20 > lojbanic communication. There IS some problem. The fact that=20 > Natlangs do have some glimpses of this problem too is not relevant,=20 > because in most case this concerns pairs of concepts very near such as=20 > "ran"/"run" where the unguessable feature is [PAST]/[PRESENT]. But=20 > here so'V =3D QUANTITY =3D { all, none, many, a few ... } is A WHOLE=20 > PARADIGM.=20 > So what is your suggestion? Should we perform a scrutiny of all cmavo and think how each selmaho=20 should sound like? What about gismu? What about lujvo (where low signal-to-noise ratio may also be important)? May be you already have something specific in mind? > > It's up to you to consider I overlook that, but I tend to think you=20 > are too much emotionally involved in your reaction. Ought to be more=20 > scientifically-minded...=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/BjKe57GMfeoJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_2996_24832813.1340264878544 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:01:13 AM UTC+4, Escape Landsome wrote:> Stop being an asshole. We all kn= ow that Lojban has problems. You're harping
> on this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, [SNI= P]
> and you can stop bleeding the wound.

You don't need to be blunt.

You react like a believer whose faith is attacked.

In any case, I don't attack YOU, nor even your "faith", but would you
say that a man that would complain to Russell about problems with the
set y =3D {x | x =E2=88=89 x} would be "an asshole" ?

Well, he would be if you take the things too much emotionally, but I
rather think he would be a great scientist.

Here I point the necessity of adapting the mechanism of redundancy in
lojbanic communication.   There IS some problem.   The fact t= hat
Natlangs do have some glimpses of this problem too is not relevant,
because in most case this concerns pairs of concepts very near such as
"ran"/"run" where the unguessable feature is [PAST]/[PRESENT].   B= ut
here so'V =3D QUANTITY =3D { all, none, many, a few ... } is A WHOLE
PARADIGM.

So what is your suggestion?
= Should we perform a scrutiny of  all cmavo and think how each selmaho = should sound like?
What about gismu?
What about lujvo (= where low signal-to-noise ratio may also be important)?

May be you already have something specific in mind?

It's up to you to consider I overlook that, but I tend to think you
are too much emotionally involved in your reaction.   Ought to be = more
scientifically-minded...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Bj= Ke57GMfeoJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_2996_24832813.1340264878544--