Received: from mail-ia0-f192.google.com ([209.85.210.192]:64980) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UHbbh-0006nG-Bn; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:27 -0700 Received: by mail-ia0-f192.google.com with SMTP id r13sf2473748iar.19 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received:date:from :to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-spam-score:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=Q80Lx6h9qFG4Q+Jhg7SRewXnLZym9NDegl+ds0kUutE=; b=LlTIMYBinQWAr3JYZEiQCsYquNXbQ5VTeEelPtarhsp+gNU4JPvD+poBgb4oOH+tut 8v65YwVqK2hKblBVCSxqUe0m7u0d7bDRHkM+Zeynk4lxNIIEZQt1W0i82Vlv5xPMl4qx XjOGas8jNwtadDzDcCGLEgo4tA6BBfTSmoDNB/giCc0VQywgfqSoUsivt5d3KheLrJ8k hyWOF8snJK1i06NDsD/IKPWfhMTJR8rB4rkXaEbvX1w5N/C6niLGGRn5LomR9ndSZeUg t2heALVygZMxfCTheZzuNLrjADyyygmhjibXl/Ifrs4jgdAdB22Mlttf8B4eY59viTq9 1rMA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received:date:from :to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-spam-score:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=Q80Lx6h9qFG4Q+Jhg7SRewXnLZym9NDegl+ds0kUutE=; b=f0A8CXGN5eIdUrDl6PH+W0WyilLmynXP5CWq5nFDVpmzwCoX5UXbBA3gHaXzhfQNLx OwboNRCzQQLrQBJLBCVmIkiIDEydRZaylh7oce/CnLF/KUcQze/WcbSXaVjkhs6bKcRi mtICC40r1zjtc18NK0xbzN65D99nAGOSkQSomxySGLgLVpKxNQ/zKxFFa/4wD86TMtSY W+CEqX2/SLxXHLOAuGqstdkdVhV1CVMYXbz4txniLmThk1JvTNp3hQn85RPJVsp3L6Hk UuyJkTs7S0XJ3VcETzUx51JvFSi/oA7v1Y3lKn+0FLriHdRti+u5FDtJQXirsW6tFZs6 bMqg== X-Received: by 10.50.187.133 with SMTP id fs5mr1303298igc.12.1363619047252; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.13.5 with SMTP id d5ls1163872igc.32.canary; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.171.201 with SMTP id aw9mr592309pac.15.1363619046284; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rs16si1546425pac.1.2013.03.18.08.04.06 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UHbbZ-0006nA-9w for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:05 -0700 Received: from mail-ia0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:47095) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UHbbT-0006mp-PB for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:04 -0700 Received: by mail-ia0-f189.google.com with SMTP id t4so2477006iag.16 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.161.225 with SMTP id xv1mr1270226igb.15.1363619033000; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <2456930.oZJB8i4mUH@caracal> References: <2456930.oZJB8i4mUH@caracal> Subject: [lojban] Re: according to MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_bar: + X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Monday, March 18, 2013 6:00:28 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > "du'o" is glossed "according to". It's quite common, though, for the > object of > "according to" to be someone who doesn't know it for certain, but asserts > it > to be true, maybe to the best of his knowledge, but maybe he's lying. This > is > better expressed by "fi'o xusra", which doesn't have a corresponding word > in > BAI. How about "xu'a" as an experimental cmavo for "fi'o xusra"? > sorry for straightforwardness but how about NOT using BAI at all (memorising 64 cmavo is a hard trick for newbies). how about {sei ko'a xusra} ? if u dont agree that {sei} is fine why not define **one** one-syllable cmavo instead of slowly replicating the whole gimste in BAI-space ? > Pierre > -- > gau do li'i co'e kei do > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, March 18, 2013 6:00:28 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:"du'o" is glossed "according to". = It's quite common, though, for the object of=20
"according to" to be someone who doesn't know it for certain, but asser= ts it=20
to be true, maybe to the best of his knowledge, but maybe he's lying. T= his is=20
better expressed by "fi'o xusra", which doesn't have a corresponding wo= rd in=20
BAI. How about "xu'a" as an experimental cmavo for "fi'o xusra"?

sorry for straightforwardness but how = about NOT using BAI at all (memorising 64 cmavo is a hard trick for newbies= ).

how about {sei ko'a xusra} ?

if u dont agree that {sei} is fine why not define *one* one-s= yllable cmavo instead of slowly replicating the whole gimste in BAI-space ?=


Pierre
--=20
gau do li'i co'e kei do


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109--