Received: from mail-yh0-f62.google.com ([209.85.213.62]:62648) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1W2Sb7-00063E-Au for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:41 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f62.google.com with SMTP id a41sf1586245yho.27 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=008kSOrk+0aj8iJRQkS/1r3FjEntUtMyLKdAdKyq3is=; b=R/FVLtIKwAMIEzW0BjD/1ixJKfltq4AWkVyUB0+YjfsyPekfmekSskbV/BLfJFcZh/ mY2vwG1py0tpCTcoK7IXXdG3eJqGmZ4Bg+FXKSguAjrUHXAqTjEl2lQGlHtBX/F07Hyd arAdBiq45U/VI2cC6afgb6ROP2Yg4Kevkpzc0z/dznVaqtwXgdDWoE+64iqmGujLl+ps fw9aqI+RB6Uc3+9Mvbz9xr5Zctt5211U9ErYW+bS2z1fcVzoUkwFIBjTM99ARNjRIILU STLnFCWw0nNxmkRepP9NS1SttbrNsXqlSpj/UOWiTCm7JPJ5wa0vMJAXCxpxDR21I/RH p1gA== X-Received: by 10.49.130.167 with SMTP id of7mr3585qeb.33.1389562153688; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:13 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.25.42 with SMTP id z10ls2263511qef.63.gmail; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.78.232 with SMTP id g68mr7280197yhe.19.1389562153097; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k45si5191618yhn.4.2014.01.12.13.29.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c; Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k19so2049826igc.5 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.51.15.130 with SMTP id fo2mr15637459igd.28.1389562152574; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.223.166 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52D2E82F.6030009@gmx.de> References: <3e423c50-f9f2-49bc-ada3-416c362875ff@googlegroups.com> <52D2E82F.6030009@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:29:12 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] [Oz] {ji'i} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134b50e7f670004efcca6fe X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a1134b50e7f670004efcca6fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In any case, can someone please document that online in whatever the appropriate place is? I don't think the mailing list archives are good enough for this. mu'o mi'e .asiz. On 12 January 2014 16:08, selpa'i wrote: > la .iesk. cu cusku di'e > >> Hello Selpa'i, >> > > Hello. > > > do you use {ji'i} in a sense different from what CLL has? >> > > Yes, slightly. > > > I don't know the English source text, but from context it seems >> implausible that there are 'ca. 34 chairs' ('30-and-circa-4 chairs') >> in the farm house, which is how I normally understand {lo ci ji'i vo >> stizu}. >> >> Does {ci ji'i vo} mean 'three to four' or something like that in the >> Oz text? If so, could you explain if that is the usual meaning of >> {ji'i} (in which case I have been misunderstanding CLL) or a deviant >> usage? >> > > The way I use {ji'i} (and I don't want to take credit for something xorxes > has been doing before me), {ci ji'i vo} means "three or four" as in a > number that's somewhere around 3 and 4. The way in which this differs from > CLL is that I treat {ji'i} like {su'o} et al. in that it breaks up number > strings. For example: > > (1a) su'o ci su'e mu > "at least three at most five" > > This is a number made up of two parts: {su'o ci} and {su'e mu}, implicitly > connected by {.e}, so (1a) is the same as (1b): > > (1b) vei su'o ci .e su'o mu > "at least three and at most five" > > (The {vei} will hopefully become unecessary soon) > > Another example, using {ro}: > > (2) ro ci lo gerku > "all three of the dogs" > > And (2a) is again the same as (2b): > > (2b) vei ro .e ci lo gerku > "all of the dogs and three of the dogs" > > (Since Lojban quantifiers are exact, this entails that {ro} equals {ci}.) > > So, having multiple number strings adjacent to each other means the same > as connecting them with {.e}, except when {.e} is not applicable, in which > case it is {.a}. > > Now, the CLL wants {ji'i} to appear as a normal digit inside a larger > number, but I agree with xorxes that this is confusing. Parsing numbers on > the fly is already difficult, because you need to hear up to three digits > before you know where they all go and unlike {su'o} et al., {ji'i} doesn't > break up the number grouping, which makes it even harder to parse. So I > like to use {ji'i} more like {su'o}/{za'u}/{su'e}/{me'i}/... > > {ci ji'i vo} is actually a shortcut for (3): > > (3) ji'i ci ji'i vo > "about three [and] about four" > "somewhere around three or four" > > With an implicit {.e} connecting them. > > You may ask how to get the CLL meanings of {ci ji'i vo}. My answer to that > question is to use {su'i}: > > (4) vei ci no su'i ji'i vo > "[exactly] thirty plus approximately four" > > (again, the {vei} is just as unnecessary as the {ku} in {ku joi} was) > > So the CLL meaning is by no means inaccessible, while {ji'i} becomes more > usable and numbers become saner to humans. > > mi'e la selpa'i mu'o > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a1134b50e7f670004efcca6fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In any case, can someone please document that online = in whatever the appropriate place is? I don't think the mailing list ar= chives are good enough for this.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.


On 12 J= anuary 2014 16:08, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .iesk. cu cusku di'e
Hello Selpa'i,

Hello.


do you use {ji'i} in a sense different from what CLL has?

Yes, slightly.


I don't know the English source text, but from context it seems
implausible that there are 'ca. 34 chairs' ('30-and-circa-4 cha= irs')
in the farm house, which is how I normally understand {lo ci ji'i vo stizu}.

Does {ci ji'i vo} mean 'three to four' or something like that i= n the
Oz text? If so, could you explain if that is the usual meaning of
{ji'i} (in which case I have been misunderstanding CLL) or a deviant usage?

The way I use {ji'i} (and I don't want to take credit for something= xorxes has been doing before me), {ci ji'i vo} means "three or fo= ur" as in a number that's somewhere around 3 and 4. The way in whi= ch this differs from CLL is that I treat {ji'i} like {su'o} et al. = in that it breaks up number strings. For example:

=A0 =A0(1a) su'o ci su'e mu
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "at least three at most five"

This is a number made up of two parts: {su'o ci} and {su'e mu}, imp= licitly connected by {.e}, so (1a) is the same as (1b):

=A0 =A0(1b) vei su'o ci .e su'o mu
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"at least three and at most five"

(The {vei} will hopefully become unecessary soon)

Another example, using {ro}:

=A0 =A0(2) ro ci lo gerku
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"all three of the dogs"

And (2a) is again the same as (2b):

=A0 =A0(2b) vei ro .e ci lo gerku
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "all of the dogs and three of the dogs"

(Since Lojban quantifiers are exact, this entails that {ro} equals {ci}.)
So, having multiple number strings adjacent to each other means the same as= connecting them with {.e}, except when {.e} is not applicable, in which ca= se it is {.a}.

Now, the CLL wants {ji'i} to appear as a normal digit inside a larger n= umber, but I agree with xorxes that this is confusing. Parsing numbers on t= he fly is already difficult, because you need to hear up to three digits be= fore you know where they all go and unlike {su'o} et al., {ji'i} do= esn't break up the number grouping, which makes it even harder to parse= . So I like to use {ji'i} more like {su'o}/{za'u}/{su'e}/{m= e'i}/...

{ci ji'i vo} is actually a shortcut for (3):

=A0 =A0 (3) ji'i ci ji'i vo
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "about three [and] about four"
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "somewhere around three or four"

With an implicit {.e} connecting them.

You may ask how to get the CLL meanings of {ci ji'i vo}. My answer to t= hat question is to use {su'i}:

=A0 =A0 (4) vei ci no su'i ji'i vo
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "[exactly] thirty plus approximately four"

(again, the {vei} is just as unnecessary as the {ku} in {ku joi} was)

So the CLL meaning is by no means inaccessible, while {ji'i} becomes mo= re usable and numbers become saner to humans.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--001a1134b50e7f670004efcca6fe--