Received: from [91.218.115.180] (port=51704 helo=03e3d93c.fifikinnyjudith.info)
by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from )
id 1V6tVX-000469-Rf
for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 19:30:15 -0700
Received: by 03e3d93c.kwpuo.fifikinnyjudith.info
(amavisd-new, port 7783) with ESMTP id 03TUOHQDE3D9QLLWVK3C;
for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 19:29:48 -0700
Reply-To:
To: lojban@lojban.org
Subject: Find Someone Special in Your Area on eHarmony
From: "eHarmony.com Partner"
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 19:29:48 -0700
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <17834365262149178324412010502220@kwpuo.fifikinnyjudith.info>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-TPFBL-TOK: 1783-65262149
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=Part.371.2298.1375842588"
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam_score: 1.3
X-Spam_score_int: 13
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Your Matches are Waiting - Review for Free! http://www.fifikinnyjudith.info/1783/120/244/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF33.php
Unsub- http://www.fifikinnyjudith.info/1783/120/244/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF18.html
[...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: cause.as]
0.0 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
------=Part.371.2298.1375842588
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Your Matches are Waiting - Review for Free!
http://www.fifikinnyjudith.info/1783/120/244/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF33.php
Unsub- http://www.fifikinnyjudith.info/1783/120/244/1050/2220.12tt65262149AAF18.html
id they worry about attempts by
the federal government to restrict or ban the sale of some weapons
or even confiscate them.Holder said in his letter that federal law
enforcement agencies will "continue to execute their duties to enforce all
federal firearms laws and regulations."Moreover, the United States will
take all appropriate action, including litigation if necessary, to prevent
the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials
enforcing federal law," Holder wrote.
to see more, they want to learn more
and maybe theyre not watching for the kind of drama or hair
pulling that we see on Jersey Shore, but you know theyre watching
for other reasons.Although Duck Dynasty has millions of viewers audiences
tend to be fickle which means the shows success may be short
lived, Myer said.I think that Duck Dynasty will be here for a
little while but I have no doubt that Duck Dynasty will slowly
loose ratings, but not necessarily because of the show, because of all
of the other networks seeing it and going, Oh my gosh, we
have to start doing [this], he said.Myer suggested shows like MTVs
now cancelled Buckwild are more attractive to networks.Doing [Buckwild]
types of shows, thats whats hot right now. I have no doubt
that within a year [Duck Dynasty] will probably drop a little bit.
It wont be gone but it definitely wont hit 10 million people
an episode. It wont top American Idol, Meyer said.Cascerceri agreed with
her fellow expert, Duck Dynasty is going to fizzle out just like
any other reality show. The thing about television in general is a
lot of times there is a lot of hype, a lot of
buzz. You know a few seasons are produced. A lot of people
are loving it but eventually everything jumps the shark.Still, she said
overall she things reality TV is getting a better reputation among viewers.Reality
TV, when it started out, it kind of had a bad name
and now its kind of evolved where there is a way it
can edu
------=Part.371.2298.1375842588
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
eHarmony.com
Your Matches are Waiting - Review for Free!
© 2012 eHarmony, Inc.
eHarmony, Inc., P.O. Box 3640, Santa Monica, CA 90408
Update Preferences |
This email was intended for lojban@lojban.org
May 3, 2013: President Obama delivers a speech at the Anthropology Museum
in Mexico City, Mexico.APIn Washington, it may seem like Congress has moved
beyond gun control.After Democrats' highly touted background check bill
was defeated in a Senate procedural vote last month, lawmakers immediately
turned their attention to other matters, like immigration legislation, the
budget and -- in light of the Boston terror attack -- security.But
President Obama and his allies do not plan to let up, with
Vice President Biden reportedly preparing to launch a new push for gun
legislation and Obama's campaign arm trying to enlist the public to support
the cause.As opponents of stricter gun laws rallied Friday in Texas for
the National Rifle Association's annual convention, Obama himself used a
speech during his visit to Mexico to once again sound the call
for new regulations."Most of the guns used to commit violence here in
Mexico come from the United States," Obama told the crowd. "I think
many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual
right to bear arms. And as president, I swore an oath to
uphold that right, and I always will. But at the same time,
as I've said in the United States, I will continue to do
everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out
of the hands of criminals and dangerous people."That can save lives here
in Mexico and back home in the United States," he said.While an
inordina
Biden.At a joint news conference Thursday, Obama and Pena Nieto carefully
sidestepped potential trouble spots. Obama steered clear of commenting on
Pena Nieto's decision to end the broad access that U.S. security agencies
have had in Mexico to combat drug trafficking, a decision that has
alarmed some U.S. officials."President Pena Nieto and his team are organizing
a vision about how they can most efficiently and effectively address these
issues," Obama said. "And we will interact with them in ways that
are appropriate, respecting that ultimately Mexico has to deal with its
problems internally and we have to deal with ours as well."For his
part, Pena Nieto declined to get drawn into the current immigration debate
in Washington, a top priority for Obama but one that is at
a delicate stage in Congress. Asked to comment on the debate, the
Mexican president merely said the Mexican government acknowledged the efforts
under way in Congress."Mexico understands that this is a domestic affair
for the U.S. and we wish you the best push that you're
giving to immigration," he said.Likewise, he demurred when asked to react
to the failure in the U.S. Senate to pass gun control legislation,
including an expanded background check for firearms buyers, even though
many guns obtained illegally in the U.S. make their way into the
hands of drug dealers in Mexico.He said he agreed with Obama's campaign
to stem gun violence, but added: "This is a domestic i
------=Part.371.2298.1375842588--