Received: from [38.102.226.108] (port=35569 helo=themostamazingcam.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c9J7D-00076J-QS for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:00:39 -0800 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:22:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Message-ID: <253945595-394559576c2c7e55fbfda4353ca10c7b6e541eeed22lojban@lojban.org_lvu> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1 From: "Fred Mclaughlin" Subject: Record-deal made for the greatest gadget ever on Shark-Tank: ep. X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_bar: / Incredible cam lense
Everyone was blown away by this on Shark-Tank

It recevied the largest deal ever from everyone

Sean Coon shows Mark, Kevin, and Lori how is lens snaps on any smartphone and turns photos 20x clearer and more vivid.

its the best camera
Never has the show seen such a successfull and amazing product

See this lens yourself

If you were to read The Verge???s glossy 2,000-word exclusive about Facebook???s first test flight of an internet-beaming drone, you???d think the June 28th flight was an unmitigated success. Published with photos provided by Facebook on the same day the company announced the test flight to the world, the story featured quotes from Mark Zuckerberg on the importance of the project and scenes of elated Facebook employees wiping away tears of joy as ???Aquila??? took to the sky.

What the piece didn???t report was the fact that the landing caused a ???structural failure??? apparently so significant that the National Transportation Safety Board has deemed it an ???accident??? and has launched an investigation.

Indeed, it appears that most of the tech press???including Gizmodo???failed to even pick up on Facebook???s ???structural failure??? comment in the blog post. Wired points to it in the last paragraph of its otherwise glowing recount of the flight, published with photos provided by Facebook, while saying the company still needs a good way to land the drone. CNN made no mention of it in its story, which was published with video provided by Facebook. Neither Wired, CNN, nor The Verge were present for the test flight and relied solely on the information provided by Facebook three weeks later. Here???s another fact: Facebook frequently peddles shit to the press that is later proved to be, at best, outright misleading, and at worst, untrue. Facebook deemed this flight a success. Is it successful if you can???t land a drone that took more than $20 million to develop without causing ???significant??? damage? Facebook apparently seems to think so and, with its tight hold on what information it gives in advance to friendly publications, that ???success??? is reported as such. It comes, of course, after a bad year for Facebook when it comes to transparency and honesty. (It???s been a great year financially!) In May, the company gradually backtracked on it statements from spokespeople after Gizmodo reported on Facebook???s trending news section. Then in June, the company gave conflicting statements to Fusion after the website reported that Facebook used location data to suggest friends. And most recently???as we noted in Volume 1 of what???s now an ongoing story???Facebook has dismissed reports that fake news played a role in the election but refuses to release evidence or data to back up its claims.




In a few days these will no longer arrive in your inbox by requesting removal now --Barton Nieland, 1551 Barton Orleans Rd Barton Vt 05822-9394

Removal from further updates will occur once you press this button -- 225 Thomas Ave N Minneapolis MN 55405