Received: from ip133.ip-178-32-174.eu ([178.32.174.133]:34217 helo=waytostopruins.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cS4GA-0007hr-3F for lojban@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:59:23 -0800 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:58:38 -0700 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1 Message-ID: From: "Earnest Cobb" To: Subject: Your funds might become frozen Friday: Do not make another deposit 7424256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_bar: - Important Document
 
 
 
 

ATM Machines Are Going Insane
Friday do not deposit anymore money

Starting last night, many people have seen scary signs on machines saying they no longer had any money just hours after making deposits.

See this frightening information before you do anything else


Full Friday Report > >
 
 
 
 





Can owning a Chagall keep the wolf from the door? In a time of a predatory capitalism that is beginning to feed on itself, that and a knowledge of complexity theory might get you more than a cup of coffee. Granted, financial consultant Rickards (The New Case for Gold, 2016, etc.) has been crying Ragnarök for a long time. Even so, the subtitle of this latest may be a touch more breathless than the contents really call for. Never mind that the author does indeed urge on his readers the thesis that the elite, whoever they may be—George Soros, to be sure, but Christopher Dodd?—have three things on their agenda: “world money, world taxation, and world order.� The conspiracy theory stuff never goes away, but when Rickards’ text settles down into its nerdier tropes, it gets interesting, if a little daunting. The author argues that the complex global financial system is now largely immune to analysis by the static tools of classical economics; “complex systems,� he rightly remarks, “behave in a completely different manner from equilibrium systems.� Number crunching begins to look like a secondary tool to the wind-reading skills of psychological forecasting: who’s going to freak out first, and when? Examining such things as Bayesian probability (the “theorem is messy, but it’s still better than nothing�), scaling metrics, and density functions, Rickards makes a good case to get smarter to how people actually think, which is seldom logical and seldom smart. He concludes, in the more sober and less conspiracy-minded portion of this double-edged book, with a view of what a well-structured, wealth-preserving portfolio might look like in a time when wealth creation is ebbing but wealth extraction—from your pocket, that is—is rising. Among its components are bonds and land, of course, but also, not surprisingly, “physical gold and silver…(coins and bars, no numismatics)� and, more surprisingly, museum-quality fine art.


There’s much for the alarmist here but food for thought for the calm investor, too.



Its important your happy and not bothered so please reqiest removal from these if you wish to not get further
((((Kennedy Nieland, 6752 S 200 E Midvale Ut 84047-1274))))


Further updates like these will stop when you tell us on this page
((((Annie Nieland | 5276 S 18Th St Milwaukee Wi 53221-3802))))






Apple is used to criticism from PC partisans, but with its first major redesign to the MacBook Pro line in years, it found itself unexpectedly taking fire from its own fan base. The new laptop was underpowered, Mac users complained, lacked ports that people actually use, had low-to-zero serviceability, and that “improved� butterfly keyboard still wasn’t that great.

The point that seems to uniformly burn pro users is the maximum amount of RAM: just 16GB of LPDD3/2133. The reason for the limit? Apple said it saves power, which lets them make the MacBook Pro thinner.

I won’t pass judgment on that decision (though I think PC makers are also too concerned with thin sometimes), but I will say there’s a pretty easy way Apple could satisfy its unhappy performance-minded customers: Bring back the MacBook Pro 17.

Yes, Apple once sold a giant 17-inch MacBook Pro, which it discontinued in 2012. Five years on, it's even easier to build a powerful laptop than it was back then. Bringing back an unapologetically big, beefy MacBook Pro 17 could be just what Apple needs to make its laptops great again. Here's what we'd put in it.