Received: from ip71.208-117-11.static.steadfastdns.net ([208.117.11.71]:53597 helo=candidate.candidaterevengeupdates.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEbq-0001CO-Id for lojban@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:03:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:08:35 -0700 Priority: Normal From: HSI-Alert To: lojban@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <28g8429.dt29910252480hg8348y-d8y88hu313847704f2e_d8g8wh84@mail.candidaterevengeupdates.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Subject: Alert: Trump-Voters - Hillary's Revenge-Plan Just-Leaked. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: HSI-Alert@candidaterevengeupdates.com X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ==============================================================. February 10th, 2017. =============================================================. Warning to Trump-Supporters - Hillary's Revenge. =============================================================. Hello lojban@lojban.org, [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) ==============================================================. February 10th, 2017. =============================================================. Warning to Trump-Supporters - Hillary's Revenge. =============================================================. Hello lojban@lojban.org, If you support and voted-for President-Trump, then this message is for-you... Information has just been leaked and Hillary is NOT-happy about it; there is now evidence she did in fact rig the 2016-election, but she STILL lost and now she is out for-revenge against all the Trump-voters. We all know about Hillary's crooked-ways and just when we thought we had finally seen the last of it, she has one more trick hidden-up the sleeves of her ugly pantsuit-jackets....you really need to watch out for this. Go here to watch this-video before it's gone: http://political.candidaterevengeupdates.com *_Please, if you would-prefer to not receive future-candidateads, go-here: http://byre9.candidaterevengeupdates.com *********************************************************************************************. -_2.8.8.5.Sanford.Avenue.S.W.No.40442. .-Grandville, M.I. ZIPCODE: #49418. Crooked Hillary Clinton said that she did not send or receive any information that was marked classified at the time. This was a lie. 110 emails in 52 email chains contained classified information at the time they were sent or received. 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time they were sent or received. 8 of those chains contained confidential information at the time they were sent or received. By sending this information over an unsecure server, Secretary Clinton made it available to hacking by foreign governments or terrorist groups. There is evidence to suggest that she exposed the names of undercover personnel, putting their lives in danger. The information she was negligent with may even have extended to U.S. intelligence gathering methods. But a recent FBI report revealed that such classified information was marked with a (C) in all emails that were sent to her. She said that she did not realize that (C) stood for ???Classified???. How could a sitting secretary of state have missed such a detail All evidence suggests that she didn???t miss it. All evidence suggest that this is a blatant lie. It seems that Secretary Clinton intended to break federal law regarding the handling of classified information. She did everything within her power to hide this from the American people. Crooked Hillary bought used blackberries on eBay, and later destroyed them with hammers when she was finished with them. These evasive actions are indicative of criminal intent. For once, we know why she lied. On Sunday, Hillary Clinton just couldn???t bring herself to say on ABC's "This Week" that Americans have an individual right to own guns. But it didn???t stop her from denying Donald Trump???s claim that she wants to abolish the Second Amendment. Clinton accused Trump of making ???outright fabrications, accusing me of something that is absolutely untrue.??? From changing the Supreme Court to make it possible to again ban guns in the United States to making it more costly to own guns, I predict that a President Hillary Clinton will do four things to either ban guns or at least reduce gun ownership, especially for poor people: 1. Sunday, George Stephanopoulos pushed Clinton twice on whether people have a right to own guns on ABC News??? "This Week": ???But that's not what I asked. I said do you believe that their conclusion that an individual's right to bear arms is a constitutional right???? Clinton could only say: ???If it is a constitutional right...??? But to anyone familiar with the Supreme Court rulings on the Second Amendment, Clinton clearly indicated that she would appoint Supreme Court Justices who will allow gun bans. Until 2008, Washington, D.C., had a complete handgun ban. It was also a felony to put a bullet in the chamber of a gun. In effect, this was a complete ban on guns. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down these laws. Clinton told Stephanopoulos: ???I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice Scalia and there was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right, as we do with every amendment, to impose reasonable regulation.??? Clinton went on to talk about her push for expanded background checks, but that has nothing to do with Scalia???s decision in Heller. Instead, she should explain what made D.C.???s regulations ???reasonable.??? She could have told us why people should be imprisoned for five years for defending their families. In McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), Supreme Court justices Stephen Breyer wrote in his dissent: "I can find nothing in the Second Amendment???s text, history, or underlying rationale that could warrant characterizing it as ???fundamental??? insofar as it seeks to protect the keeping and bearing of arms for private self-defense purposes.??? Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor joined in this dissent. Breyer and Ginsburg were both appointed by President Bill Clinton. Sotomayor was Obama???s first nominee to the Supreme Court. Obama???s second nominee, Elana Kagan, would clearly have voted the same way had she been on the court at the time. Indeed, Kagan served in the Clinton administration and helped lead the President???s gun control initiatives. If Hillary wins in November, she will appoint Scalia???s successor and the Supreme Court will overturn the Heller decision. Make no mistake about it, gun bans will return.