Received: from [85.93.11.154] (port=50045 helo=mail.dismembertool.info) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1g545X-00010i-TZ for lojban@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:18:25 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; d=dismembertool.info; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID; i=stephanie-minkel@dismembertool.info; bh=AttyHkLreHUfTy9EiG+Ax2kVcAA=; b=bsYaj8PprnYuDqVrKyhEQp7CPN+uyVU1Nf44/vJmxOFilQ+vO5OHm87utVIC/Cb1LTNepYr76eOp 9gdfhrrM7unqQbDXd84AVvQPUxiRT8/hr2Sii1wk1sEDcHS1DJStedzgM/vwjvY1vWs9ALw3WAw6 iv19EqQMe2LdmaBbSSw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dkim; d=dismembertool.info; b=Sqt2Mn6vs2IJ3MHIpMU/+pZLc5eiYw2k/j8SFgwYVaSGhLaoldcFbsMR60R45IIW7FCZB2FJz82A fvAQwzlejPJKOaYJCBPTK1YpN7OjSmaDE9pL7tcYaH/QFYN4oObdd5PdfNov/aLdFYm92RJtV73c qIRucQopyC2a6/k4pWQ=; Received: by mail.dismembertool.info id hlcpbu0001gl for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:12:54 -0400 (envelope-from ) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:12:54 -0400 From: Stephanie Minkel To: Subject: A Negative remark may have been added to your September TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian report. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_613_690827073.1537945967711" List-Unsubscribe: Message-ID: <0.0.0.C5.1D455685878A71C.646B5F@mail.dismembertool.info> X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.2 X-Spam_score_int: 32 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ID: lojban Sent On: September 25, 2018 Your Equifax, Transunion and Experian reports may have received (1) one new negative remark, Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: dismembertool.info] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image ------=_Part_613_690827073.1537945967711 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ID: lojban Sent On: September 25, 2018 Your Equifax, Transunion and Experian reports may have received (1) one new negative remark, Your scores can be viewed using the link below (Note: This will not negatively impact your score. ) Check Your Scores Here > http://www.dismembertool.info/da94M2385a8Zx610f18b3s55cD18KhscFDrfhscFDrEsvZ7C10xKzL6lLHT@i/dilation-metaphors Remove yourself from our system using this form http://www.dismembertool.info/skyrockets-frowning/af84S2385lPX8610f18b6G55cO18HhscFDrfhscFDrEsvZ7PWA10Jh6zq2WHi ------=_Part_613_690827073.1537945967711 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Viking=20 =20 =20
=20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
3D""
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20
=20

ID: = lojban

=20

Sent On: S= eptember 25, 2018

=20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
 
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20
= =20

 

=20

Your Equifax, Tran= sunion and Experian reports may have received (1) one new negative remark,<= /span>

=20

 

=20

=20

Your scores can be= viewed using the link below (Note: This will not negatively impact your sc= ore.)
 

=20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
Check= Your Scores Here >
=20
=20
















<= br /> 3D"Remove<= /a>



















=














Top 3 suitors for Le'Veon Bell trade: Colts, Jets and Bucs=
Yahoo Sports Charles Robinson,Yahoo Sports 19 hours ago
An NFL= player can irritate some portions of the locker room. He can rankle a coac= hing staff. He can even have his agent repeatedly butt heads with the team'= s front office.
But when a contract holdout starts crossing into taun= ting territory, it's time to move on. And if you have any doubts about Le'V= eon Bell being at this point of no return, just check out the jet-ski jaunt= from Miami earlier this month. If Bell's divorce from the Pittsburgh Steel= ers finally goes down, history is likely to remember that moment being the = incident that prompted the Steelers to break it off.
Le'Veon Bell has= n't suited up for the Steelers since their playoff game in January. (AP) According to a league source who spoke with Yahoo Sports on Monday, tha= t snippet of Bell on the water is when Pittsburgh officially opened the doo= r to trade offers. Partially because of the impact Bell's behavior ? and th= e questions surrounding it ? have had on the locker room, and partly becaus= e the Steelers are now convinced that Bell's heart is more invested in his = pending free agency than coming in and helping Pittsburgh. Bell's agent, Ad= isa Bakari, has been putting out trade feelers to other franchises for seve= ral weeks, the source said. But within only the past few days have the Stee= lers been open to listening to offers.
None of that means a deal is l= ikely to happen, largely because of the complications that surround an acqu= isition. There is a question of what the Steelers would accept for Bell ? a= bounty that would need to be at least a third-round pick because that is w= hat Bell's free-agent departure would likely draw in a compensatory draft c= hoice. But the more complicated matter for teams pursuing Bell is the fact = that they can't sign him until after the season, due to franchise tag restr= ictions. In effect, he could be a short-term rental for any team that acqui= res him, choosing to play out the string and maximize his value in free age= ncy. There's also the matter of Bell being intent on preserving his health = prior to that free-agency foray. It's a goal that will likely extend to any= team that signs him as well.
So what is Bell really worth and who is= in play? That's a question best answered by a handful of factors, chief am= ong them being immediate need, available money, quarterback talent and the = stability of the franchise brain trust. With that in mind, here is the case= for the top three Bell suitors, ranked from strongest case to weakest:
The basics: The Colts have the youngest roster of ?under contract? playe= rs for '19. That gives their front office and coaching staff some leeway to= splurge on a few seasoned veterans. Indianapolis also has a ton of money t= o spend next year if it chooses. Barring extensions before the offseason, t= he standardized salary-cap space for the Colts will be roughly. If allowabl= e roll-over cap space from this season is calculated, Indianapolis can push= offseason spending beyond  in '19. That's an absurd amount of space ?= and it will factor in every NFL agent trying to get their clients into the= mix with the franchise.
Andrew Luck is 29 and needs some force-multi= pliers next to him on offense. As a three-down ?unicorn? running back, Bell= fits that mold, meaning he should make Luck a better player ? and in turn,= more worth the franchise-quarterback contract he's already being paid.
Why they'll do it: Team owner Jim Irsay will never get over wasting some= of Peyton Manning's prime. And he's got to feel some of Luck's prime has b= een frittered away with injuries and some bad front-office management in th= e previous regime. So he will be on board with paying a special player like= Bell to pair with his franchise centerpiece. General manager Chris Ballard= spent enough time with the Kansas City Chiefs watching Jamaal Charles to k= now what a special three-down running back can do. Even head coach Frank Re= ich seems suited for a player like Bell, preferring to run multiple offensi= ve personnel groups and formations, constantly looking for mismatch opportu= nities.
Few running backs in the NFL are more suited than Bell to bei= ng used in a multitude of ways, regardless of down and distance. Oh, and le= st we forget, the Colts have an extra second-round pick to burn in '19 from= the New York Jets, thanks to the '18 draft trade in the first round. That'= s a very lucrative trade chip should it be dangled for Bell. And while the = Colts could wait and sign Bell in the offseason without giving up a draft p= ick, he could make a difference right now. Maybe to the point of propelling= the Colts back into the postseason.
Why they won't: Ballard has a ni= ce young team and he's off to a good start when it comes to building from w= ithin and grooming. But there is also a lot of work ahead, and Ballard is b= elieved to be an architect who prefers using free agency to accentuate, rat= her than overpaying for marquee pieces. Bell would be an overpay situation = at a position that rarely justifies it. Bell also comes with baggage with t= he league's drug-testing program and a holdout with the Steelers that might= rub some suitors the wrong way. If it comes down to having to surrender a = high pick (and a second-round pick for Bell would be a top-end price at thi= s stage), Ballard may stay patient and continue stacking his roster through= drafting and extending the growing talent base.

= =20
=20 3D""/ ------=_Part_613_690827073.1537945967711--