Received: from [67.229.237.51] (port=37719 helo=mail.coalitionprivacysweep.bid) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hoz9J-0000sf-Ce for lojban@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 16:52:23 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dkim; d=coalitionprivacysweep.bid; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID; i=sara.blanca@coalitionprivacysweep.bid; bh=ekkpMR0xlHiAZEcXgY4z9mb9YzU=; b=XDugGOW8h6R759kWmaG0gI01Y/KJpTT7Zn5RVT7mFIPqS7WHp8SyDzDBYjhekTy4JdyA7PrB/X99 fG4/nlBoXEsY9yrz24pnp2dLrFrSK4xa3uFESYAUvFlCDMNdnnho/7/hMAeEKXM1S+y52xvb9BS4 u24OddlaESkunejG5lo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dkim; d=coalitionprivacysweep.bid; b=A2mTbp7I1P2SyVN8rDcmCd2gZjqa8KIrbiivr1zxx8Ae1tmNQeAWjsZchrPm8jv9vWrifkGvxTDw e2HHzwXIKoXU8X09+3oYThAm+Tz6nvymDo1htpzlqveCpHeSHRFb6QuZS44Rma1qagRMGpB9qGmL fT5ZrZwTSHevysKtdfk=; Received: by mail.coalitionprivacysweep.bid id h6ejpq0001go for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 19:38:51 -0400 (envelope-from ) Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 19:38:51 -0400 From: Sara Blanca To: Subject: This Burns Your Belly & Arm Fat While You Sleep... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_400_1995015382.1563666332344" List-Unsubscribe: Message-ID: <0.0.0.42.1D53F5448F468FE.423012@mail.coalitionprivacysweep.bid> X-Spam-Score: 3.9 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.9 X-Spam_score_int: 39 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Breaking News: 51lbs in 61 Days: New No-Exercise "Skinny Pill" Burns Belly Fat Right Off {Continue Reading. . . } http://www.coalitionprivacysweep.bid/4a36Ph23X95zn8u610u5wb4D1a2u18lhscFDrfhscFDrEsvZ6UdH9mR6lq1k0V6MlPHUD/Gunther-concurrence Content analysis details: (3.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: coalitionprivacysweep.bid] 3.3 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [67.229.237.51 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.1 URIBL_CSS_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: coalitionprivacysweep.bid] 0.1 URIBL_CSS Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus CSS blocklist [URIs: coalitionprivacysweep.bid] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 DIET_1 BODY: Lose Weight Spam 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image ------=_Part_400_1995015382.1563666332344 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Breaking News: 51lbs in 61 Days: New No-Exercise "Skinny Pill" Burns Belly Fat Right Off {Continue Reading. . . } http://www.coalitionprivacysweep.bid/4a36Ph23X95zn8u610u5wb4D1a2u18lhscFDrfhscFDrEsvZ6UdH9mR6lq1k0V6MlPHUD/Gunther-concurrence ------=_Part_400_1995015382.1563666332344 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20
=20
=20

Breaking News: 51lbs in 61 Days: New No-Exercise "Skinny Pill" Burns Belly Fa= t Right Off

=20

3D""

=20

{Continue Reading...}

= =20

 

= =20
=20
=20



3D""


















<= br />









=





























The UK government has said it is "= deeply concerned" about Iran's "unacceptable" seizure of a B= ritish-flagged tanker in the Gulf. The Stena Impero's owners say they have = been unable to contact the ship, which was seized in the Strait of Hormuz, = a key waterway in the region. Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt has warned of &= quot;serious consequences" if the situation is not resolved quickly. I= ran said the ship was "violating international maritime rules". U= S to send troops to S Arabia amid Iran tensions Was the Iran tanker crisis = avoidable? A second British-owned Liberian-flagged tanker, the MV Mesdar, w= as also boarded by armed guards but was released. The Stena Impero was seiz= ed on Friday by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, according to the semi-offi= cial Fars news agency. Stena Bulk, which owns the vessel, said it was in &q= uot;full compliance with all navigation and international regulations"= and was approached while it was in international waters. Mr Hunt said the = tanker had been surrounded by four vessels and a helicopter and was heading= into Iranian waters. There were no reported injuries among the 23 crew mem= bers, who are Indian, Russian, Latvian and Filipino, Stena Bulk said. Norbu= lk Shipping UK, the Glasgow-based operator of the MV Mesdar, said communica= tion had been re-established with the vessel and its crew was "safe an= d well". The government's emergency committee, Cobra, met in Whitehall= twice on Friday in response to the crisis. A spokeswoman told the BBC the = government was "deeply concerned about Iran's unacceptable actions&quo= t;, saying they "represent a clear challenge to international freedom = of navigation". "We have advised UK shipping to stay out of the a= rea for an interim period," the spokeswoman added. Earlier, Mr Hunt, w= ho attended the Cobra meeting, said the seizures were "completely unac= ceptable" and "freedom of navigation must be maintained". &q= uot;We are absolutely clear that if this situation is not resolved quickly = there will be serious consequences," he said. "We are not looking= at military options. We are looking at a diplomatic way to resolve this si= tuation but we are very clear that it must be resolved." Labour leader= Jeremy Corbyn said: "The seizure of these vessels is unacceptable, an= d the tanker that remains under Iranian control must be released. Escalatio= n risks a slide into an even deeper conflict." US President Donald Tru= mp responded to the developments by saying he would talk to the UK. And US = Central Command - which is responsible for Washington's security interests = across the Middle East - said it was developing a multinational maritime ef= fort in response to the situation. Operation Sentinel will increase surveil= lance of, and security in, key waterways in the Middle East to ensure freed= om of navigation, it said. The US military said it wanted to promote mariti= me stability, ensure safe passage, and de-escalate tensions in internationa= l waters throughout the Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, the Bab el-Mandeb S= trait and the Gulf of Oman. These latest incidents come amid heightened ten= sions between the UK, the US, and Iran. Earlier this month Royal Marines he= lped seize an Iranian tanker off Gibraltar which was suspected of carrying = oil to Syria in breach of EU sanctions. In response to the seizure, Iran th= reatened to seize a British oil tanker. On 9 July, the UK raised the threat= to British shipping in Iranian waters in the Gulf to "critical" = - the highest level. A day later, Iranian boats attempted to impede a Briti= sh oil tanker in the region, before being warned off by a Royal Navy ship, = according to the Ministry of Defence. Iran denied any attempted seizure. Wa= s the tanker crisis avoidable? Difficult questions will have to be answered= by the UK government concerning the decisions that have been taken and the= resources available. Given the highly fragile and volatile situation in th= e Gulf, together with the desperate need to bolster the flagging Iran nucle= ar accord, was it sensible to detain a vessel carrying Iranian oil off Gibr= altar? Were the wider potential consequences adequately examined? And did t= he UK respond effectively to the threats from Tehran? A White House Nationa= l Security Council spokesman said this latest incident was the second time = in just over a week the UK had been "the target of escalatory violence= " by Iran. Iran has been blamed by the US for attacks on tankers which= have happened in the world's key shipping area since May. Tehran denies al= l the accusations. Tensions between the US and Iran have risen sharply sinc= e the US tightened sanctions it reimposed on Iran after unilaterally withdr= awing from a landmark 2015 nuclear deal. On Friday, the US claimed to have = destroyed an Iranian drone in the Gulf.

=20
=20 3D""/ ------=_Part_400_1995015382.1563666332344--