Received: from [45.138.96.174] (port=9519 helo=nervous.armoreworks.com) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i5Bug-00083B-Nm for lojban@lojban.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:44:16 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=7h2w09; d=armoreworks.com; h=Reply-To:Message-ID:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Date; i=jamie.g@armoreworks.com; bh=sdLz3wj6XRtCrICbpqRzHFFszZw=; b=yVIg9QFjBQ5rZwwOhM/sxQg2p+HzuAGDO5sR3CLAT9r60gxDMp1j9FQD0ukoAVXB05xIcTM9S+Ge Ra7vy90jRPgpkN7uGRe75hOJ+RyEORXn552fwhW21Sft96i/RI+0Rz6XPIOwlc5cuD9yhIdp0o5O m0w3spII6zkc8y6FNhg= Reply-To: jamie.g@armoreworks.com Message-ID: From: Jamie G MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@lojban.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?T2ZmLXBlYWsgZGVhbHMgb24gc3VtbWVyIGFuZCBmYWxsIGNydWlzZXMgeW91IGhhdmUgdG8gc2VlIHRvIGJlbGVpdmU=?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-c7m5kiEDhIEOtyuDwuJgqQWZwfl__----" Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:44:05 -0400 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_bar: - ---c7m5kiEDhIEOtyuDwuJgqQWZwfl__---- Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit http://www.armoreworks.com/main/s6kNgsMshsmD9 Thanks for the catch, fixed. As for your question, I do not believe that would significantly affect the conclusion, no. For the most part, religious wars already are wars sold to the populace / armies / foreign states using religious justifications, rather than being genuinely motivated by religion. That's the point being hinted at regarding Laud [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Luard] - if the wars really weren't about territory, why did religious conflict fight over territories? Without being unduly cynical, the line between religious wars, and non-religious wars justified by religion is very thin. [http://www.armoreworks.com/main/s6kNgsMshsmD9] I don't want to talk anymore. [http://ww1.armoreworks.com/start.html/613228] Mason &Jenner &Paulson DigitalExpress 1.5.1.7 Wildrose.BelevidereIL.61008. ---c7m5kiEDhIEOtyuDwuJgqQWZwfl__---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
 
 
 
Thanks for the catch, fixed. As for your question, I do not believe that would significantly affect the conclusion, no. For the most part, religious wars already are wars sold to the populace / armies / foreign states using religious justifications, rather than being genuinely motivated by religion. That's the point being hinted at regarding Laud - if the wars really weren't about territory, why did religious conflict fight over territories? Without being unduly cynical, the line between religious wars, and non-religious wars justified by religion is very thin.
 
 
 
  I don't want to talk anymore.
Mason &Jenner &Paulson DigitalExpress
1.5.1.7 Wildrose.Belevidere IL.61008.
  
---c7m5kiEDhIEOtyuDwuJgqQWZwfl__------